ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2018
Cancer Survivors' Social Context in the Return to Work Process: Narrative Accounts of Social Support and Social Comparison Information.
Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The unmet rehabilitation needs of colorectal cancer survivors after surgery: A qualitative meta-synthesis.Nursing open · 2024Pooled it
- Experiences of nurse cancer survivors returning to work: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Review
- Validation of the Return-to-Work Obstacles and Self-Efficacy Scale for Women on Sick Leave Due to Breast Cancer (ROSES-BC).Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Experiences of cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in the Netherlands: symptoms, daily limitations, involvement of healthcare professionals, and social support.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024Article
- Recognition During the Return-to-Work Process in Workers with Common Mental Disorders.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Does social support at home moderate the association between social support at work and work functioning among cancer patients?Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023Article
- Factors influencing employment rates and states after liver transplantation in China: A multi-centre cross-sectional study.Nursing open · 2023Article
- The mediating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between social support and work withdrawal behavior: A cross-sectional study among young lung cancer survivors.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2023Article
- Factors of decisive importance for being in work or not during two years after breast cancer surgery: content analysis of 462 women's open answers.BMC women's health · 2021Review
- Returning to Work After Cancer in Australia: What Facilitates a Positive Return to Work Experience?Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Labor-force participation and working patterns among women and men who have survived cancer: A descriptive 9-year longitudinal cohort study.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2021Article
- The Relation of Readiness for Return to Work and Return to Work Among Iranian Cancer Survivors.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020Article
- Return to work after a cancer diagnosis: a meta-review of reviews and a meta-synthesis of recent qualitative studies.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose Returning to work is a process that is intertwined with the social aspects of one's life, which can influence the way in which that person manages their return to work and also determines the support available to them. This study aimed to explore cancer patients' perceptions of the role of their social context in relation to returning to work following treatment. Methods Twenty-three patients who had received a diagnosis of either urological, breast, gynaecological, or bowel cancer participated in semi-structured interviews examining general perceptions of cancer, work values and perceptions of the potential impact of their cancer diagnosis and treatment on work. Interviews were analysed using the iterative process of Framework Analysis. Results Two superordinate themes emerged as influential in the return to work process: Social support as a facilitator of return to work (e.g. co-workers' support and support outside of the workplace) and Social comparison as an appraisal of readiness to return to work (e.g. comparisons with other cancer patients, colleagues, and employees in other organisations or professions). Conclusions Two functions of the social context of returning to work after cancer were apparent in the participants' narrative: the importance of social support as a facilitator of returning to work and the utilisation of social comparison information in order to appraise one's readiness to return to work. The role of social context in returning to work has largely been absent from the research literature to date. The findings of this study suggest that social support and social comparison mechanisms may have a significant impact on an individual's successful return to the workplace.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28980114What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.