Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28980104›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2018

Experiences of a High-Risk Population with Prenatal Hemoglobinopathy Carrier Screening in a Primary Care Setting: a Qualitative Study.

Kim C A Holtkamp, Phillis Lakeman, Hind Hader, Suze M J P Jans, Maria Hoenderdos, Henna A M Playfair, Martina C Cornel, Marjolein Peters, Lidewij Henneman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kim C A HoltkampDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Phillis LakemanDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hind HaderDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Suze M J P JansDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maria HoenderdosMidwifery practice Vida, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henna A M PlayfairMidwifery practice Bijlmermeer, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martina C CornelDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marjolein PetersDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Emma's Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lidewij HennemanDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. l.henneman@vumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-3531-0597
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLGemeente Amsterdam · NLNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research · NLVanda Institute · KH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carrier screening for hemoglobinopathies (HbPs; sickle cell disease and thalassemia) aims to facilitate autonomous reproductive decision-making. In the absence of a Dutch national HbP carrier screening program, some primary care midwives offer screening on an ad hoc basis. This qualitative descriptive study explores how pregnant women perceive an offer of HbP carrier screening by their midwife. Semi-structured interviews (n = 26) were conducted with pregnant women at risk of being a HbP carrier, and whom were offered screening at their booking appointment in one of two midwifery practices in Amsterdam. The results showed that half of the respondents were familiar with HbPs. Generally, women perceived the offer of HbP carrier screening as positive, and most women (n = 19) accepted screening. Seven declined, of whom two already knew their carrier status. Important reasons to accept screening were to obtain knowledge about their own carrier status and health of their unborn child, and the ease of the procedure. A multistep process of decision-making was observed, as many women did not give follow-up testing (e.g. partner, invasive diagnostics) much consideration while deciding on accepting or declining HbP screening. Women experienced information overload, and preferred receiving the information at a different moment (e.g. before the intake by a leaflet, or preconceptionally). In conclusion, while prenatal HbP carrier screening is perceived as positive, informed decision-making seems to be suboptimal, and both the content and timing of the information provided needs improvement.

Indexed as

Prenatal DiagnosisAdultDecision MakingFemaleHemoglobinopathiesHumansMass ScreeningNetherlandsPregnancyPrenatal CarePrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchRisk FactorsCarrier screeningHemoglobinopathiesMidwivesPrenatal testingPrimary careQualitative researchSickle cell diseaseThalassemia

Identifiers

PMID28980104
PMCPMC5943376
OpenAlexW2761731818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.