ReviewPediatric cardiology2018
Decision Making in Paediatric Cardiology. Are We Prone to Heuristics, Biases and Traps?
Review in Pediatric cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- History Repeating: Lessons From Citrus Fruits, Penicillin, and Delayed Adoption in Pediatric Cardiology.CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2026Article
- What Makes an Effective Chief of Pediatric Cardiology: Insights from Chiefs of Programs Globally.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Organizational Culture in Pediatric Cardiology: Results of a Multinational Exploratory Physician Survey with Implications for Team Performance and Patient Safety.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Teamwork as a Clinical Competency in Pediatric Cardiology: A Measurement-Feedback-Simulation Framework for Improving Decision-Making and Outcomes.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Twinning International Pediatric Cardiology Fellowship Programs: A Transformative Educational Experience for Trainees with Potential for Global Adoption.Pediatric cardiology · 2025Article
- What Makes an Effective Chief of Pediatric Cardiology: Insights From Chiefs of North American Pediatric Programs.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- How Do Paediatricians Manage Comfort with Uncertainty in Clinical Decision-Making.Perspectives on medical education · 2024Article
- The modernization of cardiology in Iraq (From apprenticeship to competency-based approach).Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- Medical education and training within congenital cardiology: current global status and future directions in a post COVID-19 world.Cardiology in the young · 2022Review
- Article
- Decision-Making in the Catheter Laboratory: The Most Important Variable in Successful Outcomes.Pediatric cardiology · 2020Review
- Complex Decision Making in the Pediatric Catheterization Laboratory: Catheterizer, Know Thyself and the Data.Pediatric cardiology · 2018Review
- Prospective Analysis of Decision Making During Joint Cardiology Cardiothoracic Conference in Treatment of 107 Consecutive Children with Congenital Heart Disease.Pediatric cardiology · 2018Article
- Interventional Cardiology for Congenital Heart Disease.Korean circulation journal · 2018Review
- Artificial intelligence in pediatric cardiology: Where do we stand in 2024?Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
- Artificial intelligence in pediatric cardiology and cardiac surgery: Irrational hype or paradigm shift?Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hidden traps in decision making have been long recognised in the behavioural economics community. Yet we spend very limited, if any time, analysing our decision-making processes in medicine and paediatric cardiology. Systems 1 and 2 thought processes differentiate between rapid emotional thoughts and slow deliberate rational thoughts. For fairly clear cut medical decisions, in-depth analysis may not be needed, but in our field of paediatric cardiology it is not uncommon for challenging cases and occasionally 'simple' cases to generate significant debate and uncertainty as to the best decision. Although morbidity and mortality meetings frequently highlight poor outcomes for our patients, they often neglect to analyse the process of thought which underlined those decisions taken. This article attempts to review commonly acknowledged traps in decision making in the behavioural economics world to ascertain whether these heuristics translate to decision making in the paediatric cardiology environment. We also discuss potential individual and collective solutions to pitfalls in decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28980097What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.