Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28979936›Full record

ArticleACS central science2017

Allosteric Communication Networks in Proteins Revealed through Pocket Crosstalk Analysis.

Giuseppina La Sala, Sergio Decherchi, Marco De Vivo, Walter Rocchia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS central science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. GSK-3β Allosteric Inhibition: A Dead End or a New Pharmacological Frontier?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Probabilistic Pocket Druggability PredictionFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Finding Druggable Sites in Proteins Using TACTICS.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giuseppina La SalaLaboratory of Molecular Modeling and Drug Discovery, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego 30, 16163 Genova, Italy.
Sergio DecherchiCONCEPT Lab, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego 30, 16163 Genova, Italy.
Marco De VivoLaboratory of Molecular Modeling and Drug Discovery, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego 30, 16163 Genova, Italy.
Walter RocchiaCONCEPT Lab, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego 30, 16163 Genova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection and characterization of binding pockets and allosteric communication in proteins is crucial for studying biological regulation and performing drug design. Nowadays, ever-longer molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are routinely used to investigate the spatiotemporal evolution of proteins. Yet, there is no computational tool that can automatically detect all the pockets and potential allosteric communication networks along these extended MD simulations. Here, we use a novel and fully automated algorithm that examines pocket formation, dynamics, and allosteric communication embedded in microsecond-long MD simulations of three pharmaceutically relevant proteins, namely, PNP, A2A, and Abl kinase. This dynamic analysis uses pocket crosstalk, defined as the temporal exchange of atoms between adjacent pockets, along the MD trajectories as a fingerprint of hidden allosteric communication networks. Importantly, this study indicates that dynamic pocket crosstalk analysis provides new mechanistic understandings on allosteric communication networks, enriching the available experimental data. Thus, our results suggest the prospective use of this unprecedented dynamic analysis to characterize transient binding pockets for structure-based drug design.

Identifiers

PMID28979936
PMCPMC5620967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.