Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28979934›Full record

ReviewACS central science2017

Collective Approach to Advancing C-H Functionalization.

Huw M L Davies, Daniel Morton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS central science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Mono and diRSC advances · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Oxidative Cross Dehydrogenative Coupling ofJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Efficient Amination of Activated and Non-Activated C(spAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Intramolecular C(spAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. From Pd(OAc)Accounts of chemical research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Huw M L DaviesDepartment of Chemistry, Emory University, 1515 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.
Daniel MortonDepartment of Chemistry, Emory University, 1515 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

C-H functionalization is a very active research field that has attracted the interest of scientists from many disciplines. This Outlook describes the collaborative efforts within the NSF CCI Center for Selective C-H Functionalization (CCHF) to develop catalyst-controlled selective methods to enhance the synthetic potential of C-H functionalization.

Identifiers

PMID28979934
PMCPMC5620983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.