Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28979788›Full record

ReviewRegeneration (Oxford, England)2017

Zebrafish heart regeneration: 15 years of discoveries.

Juan Manuel González-Rosa, Caroline E Burns, C Geoffrey Burns

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Regeneration (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular evolution of animal aging.The EMBO journal · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juan Manuel González-RosaCardiovascular Research Center Massachusetts General Hospital Charlestown MA 02129 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2453-5670
Caroline E BurnsCardiovascular Research Center Massachusetts General Hospital Charlestown MA 02129 USA.
C Geoffrey BurnsCardiovascular Research Center Massachusetts General Hospital Charlestown MA 02129 USA.

Funding

Change of InstitutionR35HL135831 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BURNS, CAROLINE E · 2017 to 2023
$4.2M
Deciphering the role of Notch signaling in zebrafish heart regenerationR01HL127067 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BURNS, C. GEOFFREY, BURNS, CAROLINE E · 2015 to 2018
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL127067NHLBI NIH HHS R35 HL135831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. Compared to other organs such as the liver, the adult human heart lacks the capacity to regenerate on a macroscopic scale after injury. As a result, myocardial infarctions are responsible for approximately half of all cardiovascular related deaths. In contrast, the zebrafish heart regenerates efficiently upon injury through robust myocardial proliferation. Therefore, deciphering the mechanisms that underlie the zebrafish heart's endogenous regenerative capacity represents an exciting avenue to identify novel therapeutic strategies for inducing regeneration of the human heart. This review provides a historical overview of adult zebrafish heart regeneration. We summarize 15 years of research, with a special focus on recent developments from this fascinating field. We discuss experimental findings that address fundamental questions of regeneration research. What is the origin of regenerated muscle? How is regeneration controlled from a genetic and molecular perspective? How do different cell types interact to achieve organ regeneration? Understanding natural models of heart regeneration will bring us closer to answering the ultimate question: how can we stimulate myocardial regeneration in humans?

Indexed as

cardiomyocyte proliferationheart regenerationmyocardial infarctionzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID28979788
PMCPMC5617908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.