ArticleClinical kidney journal2017
A clinical-genetic approach to assessing cardiovascular risk in patients with CKD.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of a single nucleotide polymorphism combination pattern of the Klotho gene with non-cardiovascular death in patients with chronic kidney disease.Clinical kidney journal · 2020Article
- Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor and sarcoglycan delta genetic variants can affect cardiovascular risk in chronic kidney disease patients under hemodialysis.Clinical kidney journal · 2020Article
- Genetics, Genomics, and Precision Medicine in End-Stage Kidney Disease.Seminars in nephrology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronary heart disease (CHD) is the primary cause of death in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but current equations for assessing coronary risk have low accuracy in this group. We have reported that the addition of a genetic risk score (GRS) to the Framingham risk function improved its predictive capacity in the general population. The aims of this study were to evaluate the association between this GRS and coronary events in the CKD population and to determine whether the addition of the GRS to coronary risk prediction functions improves the estimation of coronary risk at the earliest possible stages of kidney disease.
methodsA total of 632 CKD patients, aged 35-74 years, who had Stage 4-5 CKD, were on dialysis, had a functioning renal transplant or had returned to dialysis after transplant failure were included and followed up for a mean of 9.3 years. The transitions between disease states and the development of coronary events were registered. The increase in predictive ability that was obtained by including the GRS was measured as the improvement in the C-statistic and as the net reclassification index.
resultsThe GRS was independently associated with the risk of CHD (hazards ratio 1.34; 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.71; P = 0.022), especially in Stages 4 and 5 CKD, and kidney transplant patients. A coronary risk prediction function that incorporated chronic kidney disease (CKD) disease state, age, sex and the GRS had significantly greater predictive capacity (AUC 70.1, P = 0.01) and showed good reclassification (net reclassification improvement 28.6).
conclusionThis new function, combining genetic and clinical data, identifies CKD patients with a high risk of coronary events more accurately, allowing us to prevent such events more effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.