ArticleClinical kidney journal2017
Efficacy of mycophenolate treatment in adults with steroid-dependent/frequently relapsing idiopathic nephrotic syndrome.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunosuppression for adult steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Management of immune-mediated glomerular diseases in the elderly.Renal failure · 2024Review
- Detailed Pathophysiology of Minimal Change Disease: Insights into Podocyte Dysfunction, Immune Dysregulation, and Genetic Susceptibility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Mycophenolate mofetil and telmisartan for the treatment of proteinuria secondary to minimal change disease podocytopathy in a dog.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study assessed the efficacy of therapy with mycophenolate (MF) and reduced doses of steroids in adults with steroid-dependent/frequently relapsing idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (SD/FR-INS).
methodsTwenty-nine nephrotic patients (including 16 males and 13 females; mean age: 40 years, range: 18-74) were treated. Starting doses of MF were 2000 mg/day for mofetil MF (1500 mg/day in one patient) or 1440 mg/day for sodium MF. The initial prednisone (PDN) dose was 10 mg/day in 14 patients, 5 mg/day in two patients and no steroids in one patient. In the remaining 12 patients, moderate initial doses of PDN were administered (mean: 23.7 mg/day, range: 15-40), tapering to 10 mg/day after 1 month.
resultsNephrotic syndrome remission was achieved in 27/29 cases (93.1%) (25 complete, 2 partial). Two patients showed resistance to the prescribed schedule. The first cycle of MF therapy was concluded in 20 patients after a mean (range) of 16.9 months (12-49). Maintenance of remission was observed in 11 of these 20 cases (55%) after a mean follow-up of 32.8 months (12-108). In nine patients with nephrotic syndrome relapse after tapering of MF (MF dependency), the same MF-PDN schedule was restarted, leading again to remission in all nine. The remaining seven MF-sensitive patients are still receiving their first therapeutic cycle. To date, the mean time under therapy in the 27 MF-sensitive patients is 38 months (4-216). Regarding complications, only minor digestive disorders and a slight decrease in blood haemoglobin levels were observed in a few patients.
conclusionsMF plus reduced doses of PDN is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for adult SD/FR-INS. Though MF dependence is observed, its low toxicity could allow long periods of therapy if it is required to maintain nephrotic syndrome remission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.