Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28979618›Full record

ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2017

Performance of SD Bioline Malaria Ag Pf/Pan rapid test in the diagnosis of malaria in South-Kivu, DR Congo.

Théophile Mitima Kashosi, Joseph Minani Mutuga, Devotte Sifa Byadunia, John Kivukuto Mutendela, Basimike Mulenda, Kanigula Mubagwa

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Lab-On-chip Tool for Rapid, Quantitative, and Stage-selective Diagnosis of Malaria.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Théophile Mitima KashosiLaboratory of Biomedical Research and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine & Community Health, Université Evangélique en Afrique (UEA), Bukavu, DR Congo.
Joseph Minani MutugaClinical Laboratory, General Referral Hospital, Katana, DR Congo.
Devotte Sifa ByaduniaDepartment of Laboratory Technologies, Institut Supérieur des Techniques Médicales (ISTM), Bukavu, DR Congo.
John Kivukuto MutendelaMédecins d'Afrique, Coordination-Europe, Savigny Sur Orge, France.
Basimike MulendaWHO, Malaria Capacity Development/Strategic Planning & Prevention, Regional Office for Africa, Libreville, Gabon.
Kanigula MubagwaInternational Center for Advanced Research and Training (ICART), Bukavu, DR Congo, and Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Institut Supérieur de Technique Médicale · CDInstitut Africain d'Informatique · GAKinshasa General Hospital · CDKU Leuven · BE

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUse of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) has improved the management of this disease. We evaluated the validity of the SD-Bioline Malaria-Ag-Pf/Pan™ (Batch 60952) RDT supplied by the Malaria Control Program of the DRCongo.

methodscChildren (n = 460) aged below 5 years seen in curative care (CC) for suspected malaria and in pre-school consultation (PSC) in two rural centers underwent clinical evaluation and capillary blood collection for microscopic reading of thick smear (TS) and thin film (BF), and for RDT. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of the RDT, and the corresponding accuracy and Youden indices were determined using microscopic data as reference. Results were compared using the Chi-square test.

resultsMicroscopy showed malaria infection in 53.8% of CC and in 10.8% of PSC children. Similar results were obtained using the RDT (CC: 47.1%; PSC: 18.3%; P > 0.05 vs. microscopy). Se of the RDT was 82.1%, Sp 92.0%, PPV 88.5% and NPV 87.4%. RDT positivity was significantly (p < 0.01) associated with some symptoms (chills, profuse sweating) and with a recent history of malaria attack. In addition, Se of the RDT depended on parasitemia and decreased at low parasite denstity.

conclusionSD-Bioline Malaria-Ag-Pf/Pan™ RDT has a relatively good sensitivity and specificity but seems useful only for high parasitemia. Negative SD Bioline Malaria Ag Pf/Pan™ RDT should be complemented with microscopy when clinical signs suggest malaria.

Indexed as

Child, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDemocratic Republic of the CongoDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansInfantMalariaMicroscopyParasitemiaPredictive Value of TestsRural PopulationSensitivity and SpecificityDR CongoMalaria Ag Pf/PanPerformanceSD BiolineSouth-Kivu

Identifiers

PMID28979618
PMCPMC5622830
OpenAlexW2739019588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.