ArticleJournal of the Intensive Care Society2017
Exploring obstacles to critical care trials in the UK: A qualitative investigation.
Article in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Views on consent approaches used in emergency and critical care research: a rapid, systematic review.Trials · 2026Pooled it
- Omega-6 sparing effects of parenteral lipid emulsions-an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.Critical care (London, England) · 2022Pooled it
- What did trial participants in REMAP-CAP Japan experience during the COVID-19 pandemic? A qualitative study.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- The POETIC (PrOcess Evaluation of Trials In Critical care) Framework: A Structured Approach for Designing and Conducting Process Evaluations in Critical Care Trials.Critical care explorations · 2025Article
- Equity of participants in clinical trials in critical care and perioperative medicine research: a systematic review.BJA open · 2025Review
- The Impact of Extended-Hours Patient Recruitment on Critical Care Clinical Trial Enrollment.Critical care explorations · 2025Article
- Patient Preferences and Priorities for the Design of an Acute Kidney Injury Prevention Trial: Findings from a Consensus Workshop.Kidney360 · 2024Article
- Research Priorities in Critical Care Cardiology: JACC Expert Panel.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2023Review
- Learning from stakeholders to inform good practice guidance on consent to research in intensive care units: a mixed-methods study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Co-enrolment to UK Critical Care Studies - A 2019 update.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2022Article
- The research environment of critical care in three Asian countries: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Barriers and challenges in the process of including critically ill patients in clinical studies.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2020Observational
- Synthesis of qualitative research studies regarding the factors surrounding UK critical care trial infrastructure.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Optimising ambulance service contribution to clinical trials: a phenomenological exploration using focus groups.British paramedic journal · 2019Article
- Challenges hindering emergency physicians; involvement in multicenter collaborative studies in Japan: A nationwide survey analysis.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical trials in critical care are often resource-intense, with many unique challenges. Barriers to effective recruitment and implementation of study intervention have not been explored in a UK context.
aimTo identify facilitating factors and barriers to enrolling patients into critical care clinical trials within the UK from clinician's perspectives.
methodsA qualitative interview study was undertaken on behalf of the National Institute of Health Research critical care specialty group, in which research active clinicians across different Clinical Research Networks were interviewed. A loosely structured interview schedule was used, based on themes generated from the literature associated with accessing critical care trials. Research teams (critical care doctors, research nurses, and trial coordinators) from hospitals from each Clinical Research Network were contacted to try to achieve representation across the UK.
resultsInterviews were carried out across nine UK Clinical Research Networks with a range of doctors and research nurses. All hospitals were teaching hospitals with varying research nurse numbers and allocated consultant research sessions. There were a range of six to nine ongoing clinical trials in critical care for each centre representative interviewed. Data were analysed using framework analysis, and six final themes were identified related to factors associated with: centre, unit, resources, study, clinician, and patient/family. The most commonly cited barrier to conducting clinical trials was related to resources, namely insufficient human and financial resources, leading to staff and study recruitment difficulties. Clinical uncertainty and equipoise regarding comparative merits of trials were challenging in terms of engaging critical care teams. A number of patient and family factors added complexities in terms of recruitment; however, refusal rates were generally reported as low.
conclusionFlexibility in funding and employment by research teams enables continuity of studies and staff. Innovative measures to incentivise research nurses and clinical teams can help recruit more patients into trials. Research teams are highly committed to providing cover to recruit critical care trials, and a significant effort to anticipate barriers is undertaken; these endeavours are summarised to provide guidance for other teams wishing to address any potential difficulties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.