Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28979274›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2017

Biochemical Defense Response: Characterizing the Plasticity of Source and Sink in Spring Wheat under Terminal Heat Stress.

Ranjeet R Kumar, Suneha Goswami, Mohammed Shamim, Upama Mishra, Monika Jain, Khushboo Singh, Jyoti P Singh, Kavita Dubey, Shweta Singh, Gyanendra K Rai and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. ExploringPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Grain Composition and Quality in PortuguesePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Sucrose Utilization for Improved Crop Yields: A Review Article.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ranjeet R KumarDivision of Biochemistry, Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew Delhi, India.
Suneha GoswamiDivision of Biochemistry, Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew Delhi, India.
Mohammed ShamimDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering, Bihar Agricultural UniversityBhagalpur, India.
Upama MishraDivision of Biochemistry, Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew Delhi, India.
Monika JainDivision of Biochemistry, Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew Delhi, India.
Khushboo SinghDivision of Biochemistry, Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew Delhi, India.
Jyoti P SinghDivision of Biochemistry, Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew Delhi, India.
Kavita DubeyDivision of Biochemistry, Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew Delhi, India.
Shweta SinghDivision of Biochemistry, Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew Delhi, India.
Gyanendra K RaiSher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and TechnologyJammu, India.
Gyanendra P SinghIndian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Indian Council of Agricultural ResearchKarnal, India.
Himanshu PathakCentral Rice Research InstituteCuttack, India.
Viswanathan ChinnusamyDivision of Plant Physiology, Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew Delhi, India.
Shelly PraveenDivision of Biochemistry, Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew Delhi, India.
Indian Agricultural Research Institute · INBihar Agricultural University · INCentral Rice Research Institute · INIndian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research · INSher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wheat is highly prone to terminal heat stress (HS) under late-sown conditions. Delayed- sowing is one of the preferred methods to screen the genotypes for thermotolerance under open field conditions. We investigated the effect of terminal HS on the thermotolerance of four popular genotypes of wheat i.e. WR544, HD2967, HD2932, and HD2285 under field condition. We observed significant variations in the biochemical parameters like protein content, antioxidant activity, proline and total reducing sugar content in leaf, stem, and spike under normal (26 ± 2°C) and terminal HS (36 ± 2°C) conditions. Maximum protein, sugars and proline was observed in HD2967, as compared to other cultivars under terminal HS. Wheat cv. HD2967 showed more adaptability to the terminal HS. Differential protein-profiling in leaves, stem and spike of HD2967 under normal (26 ± 2°C) and terminal HS (36 ± 2°C) showed expression of some unique protein spots. MALDI-TOF/MS analysis showed the DEPs as RuBisCO (Rub), RuBisCO activase (Rca), oxygen evolving enhancer protein (OEEP), hypothetical proteins, etc. Expression analysis of genes associated with photosynthesis (

Indexed as

2-DEprotein profilingqRT-PCRstarch synthasestress-associated proteinsterminal HStotal antioxidant capacitywheat

Identifiers

PMID28979274
PMCPMC5611565
OpenAlexW2754898097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.