Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28979208›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2017

Sedentary Behavior among National Elite Rowers during Off-Training-A Pilot Study.

Billy Sperlich, Martin Becker, Andreas Hotho, Birgit Wallmann-Sperlich, Mahdi Sareban, Kay Winkert, Jürgen M Steinacker, Gunnar Treff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Billy SperlichIntegrative and Experimental Exercise Science, Institute for Sport Sciences, University of WuerzburgWuerzburg, Germany.
Martin BeckerDMIR Research Group, University of WuerzburgWuerzburg, Germany.
Andreas HothoDMIR Research Group, University of WuerzburgWuerzburg, Germany.
Birgit Wallmann-SperlichInstitute for Sport Sciences, University of WuerzburgWuerzburg, Germany.
Mahdi SarebanDivision of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ulm University HospitalUlm, Germany.
Kay WinkertDivision of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ulm University HospitalUlm, Germany.
Jürgen M SteinackerDivision of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ulm University HospitalUlm, Germany.
Gunnar TreffDivision of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ulm University HospitalUlm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this pilot study was to analyze the off-training physical activity (PA) profile in national elite German U23 rowers during 31 days of their preparation period. The hours spent in each PA category (i.e., sedentary: <1.5 metabolic equivalents (MET); light physical activity: 1.5-3 MET; moderate physical activity: 3-6 MET and vigorous intense physical activity: >6 MET) were calculated for every valid day (i.e., >480 min of wear time). The off-training PA during 21 weekdays and 10 weekend days of the final 11-week preparation period was assessed by the wrist-worn multisensory device Microsoft Band II (MSBII). A total of 11 rowers provided valid data (i.e., >480 min/day) for 11.6 week days and 4.8 weekend days during the 31 days observation period. The average sedentary time was 11.63 ± 1.25 h per day during the week and 12.49 ± 1.10 h per day on the weekend, with a tendency to be higher on the weekend compared to weekdays (

Indexed as

accelerometermicrosoft band 2multi-sensorrecoverysedentary behaviorwearable

Identifiers

PMID28979208
PMCPMC5611419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.