ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2017
Do Neuroscience Journals Accept Replications? A Survey of Literature.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Most Common Publication Types of Neuroimaging Literature: Papers With High Levels of Evidence Are on the Rise.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Pooled it
- Article
- Practical recommendations to conduct a neuroimaging meta-analysis for neuropsychiatric disorders.Human brain mapping · 2019Review
- Molecular neuroscience at its "high": bibliometric analysis of the most cited papers on endocannabinoid system, cannabis and cannabinoids.Journal of cannabis research · 2019Article
- Microstructural White Matter Characteristics in Parkinson's Disease With Depression: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Replication Study.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Article
- An Updated Survey on Statistical Thresholding and Sample Size of fMRI Studies.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2018Article
- Trait impulsivity is not related to post-commissural putamen volumes: A replication study in healthy men.PloS one · 2018Article
- The Impact Factor Fallacy.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Readability of the 100 Most-Cited Neuroimaging Papers Assessed by Common Readability Formulae.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2018Article
- Challenges in Reproducibility, Replicability, and Comparability of Computational Models and Tools for Neuronal and Glial Networks, Cells, and Subcellular Structures.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.