ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2017
Image registration reveals central lens thickness minimally increases during accommodation.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Effects of accommodation on geometrical parameters of human lens: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- The evolution of mechanism of accommodation and a novel hypothesis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023Review
- Subtle changes of the crystalline lens after cycloplegia: a retrospective study.BMC ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Inter-eye Differences in Ocular Biometric Parameters of Concomitant Exotropia.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Image registration of the human accommodating eye demonstrates equivalent increases in lens equatorial radius and central thickness.International journal of ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Mechanism of accommodation assessed by change in precisely registered ocular images associated with concurrent change in auto-refraction.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2018Article
- Image registration: Required for all ophthalmic imaging as demonstrated by optoretinography.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate anterior chamber depth, central crystalline lens thickness and lens curvature during accommodation.
settingCalifornia Retina Associates, El Centro, CA, USA.
designHealthy volunteer, prospective, clinical research swept-source optical coherence biometric image registration study of accommodation.
methodsTen subjects (4 females and 6 males) with an average age of 22.5 years (range: 20-26 years) participated in the study. A 45° beam splitter attached to a Zeiss IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Jena, Germany) biometer enabled simultaneous imaging of the cornea, anterior chamber, entire central crystalline lens and fovea in the dilated right eyes of subjects before, and during focus on a target 11 cm from the cornea. Images with superimposable foveal images, obtained before and during accommodation, that met all of the predetermined alignment criteria were selected for comparison. This registration requirement assured that changes in anterior chamber depth and central lens thickness could be accurately and reliably measured. The lens radii of curvatures were measured with a pixel stick circle.
resultsImages from only 3 of 10 subjects met the predetermined criteria for registration. Mean anterior chamber depth decreased, -67 μm (range: -0.40 to -110 μm), and mean central lens thickness increased, 117 μm (range: 100-130 μm). The lens surfaces steepened, anterior greater than posterior, while the lens, itself, did not move or shift its position as appeared from the lack of movement of the lens nucleus, during 7.8 diopters of accommodation, (range: 6.6-9.7 diopters).
conclusionImage registration, with stable invariant references for image correspondence, reveals that during accommodation a large increase in lens surface curvatures is associated with only a small increase in central lens thickness and no change in lens position.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.