Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28978767›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018

State-dependent rhythmogenesis and frequency control in a half-center locomotor CPG.

Jessica Ausborn, Abigail C Snyder, Natalia A Shevtsova, Ilya A Rybak, Jonathan E Rubin

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Inhibitory Subpopulations in preBötzinger Complex Play Distinct Roles in Modulating Inspiratory Rhythm and Pattern.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica AusbornDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abigail C SnyderDepartment of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Natalia A ShevtsovaDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ilya A RybakDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jonathan E RubinDepartment of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Spinal cord neural circuits for left-right and flexor-extensor coordinationR01NS090919 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI GOULDING, MARTYN D, KIEHN, OLE · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
CRCNS: Rhythm generation in rodent spinal cord R01NS095366 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI DOUGHERTY, KIMBERLY J · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
CRCNS: Organization of the locomotor CPG in the rodent spinal cordR01NS081713 · NINDS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI HARRIS-WARRICK, RONALD M, RYBAK, ILYA A · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS081713NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS090919NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS095366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spinal locomotor central pattern generator (CPG) generates rhythmic activity with alternating flexion and extension phases. This rhythmic pattern is likely to result from inhibitory interactions between neural populations representing flexor and extensor half-centers. However, it is unclear whether the flexor-extensor CPG has a quasi-symmetric organization with both half-centers critically involved in rhythm generation, features an asymmetric organization with flexor-driven rhythmogenesis, or comprises a pair of intrinsically rhythmic half-centers. There are experimental data that support each of the above concepts but appear to be inconsistent with the others. In this theoretical/modeling study, we present and analyze a CPG model architecture that can operate in different regimes consistent with the above three concepts depending on conditions, which are defined by external excitatory drives to CPG half-centers. We show that control of frequency and phase durations within each regime depends on network dynamics, defined by the regime-dependent expression of the half-centers' intrinsic rhythmic capabilities and the operating phase transition mechanisms (escape vs. release). Our study suggests state dependency in locomotor CPG operation and proposes explanations for seemingly contradictory experimental data. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our theoretical/modeling study focuses on the analysis of locomotor central pattern generators (CPGs) composed of conditionally bursting half-centers coupled with reciprocal inhibition and receiving independent external drives. We show that this CPG framework can operate in several regimes consistent with seemingly contradictory experimental data. In each regime, we study how intrinsic dynamics and phase-switching mechanisms control oscillation frequency and phase durations. Our results provide insights into the organization of spinal circuits controlling locomotion.

Indexed as

LocomotionModels, NeurologicalAnimalsCentral Pattern GeneratorsHumansMuscle, SkeletalPeriodicityReaction Timecentral pattern generatorcomputational modelingflexor-extensor half-centerphase transition mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID28978767
PMCPMC5866471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.