ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018
Figure-ground organization in the visual cortex: does meaning matter?
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- An extremely fast neural mechanism to detect emotional visual stimuli: A two-experiment study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Evidence in Support of the Border-Ownership Neurons for Representing Textured Figures.iScience · 2020Article
- Statistical Learning Signals for Complex Visual Images in Macaque Early Visual Cortex.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Figure and ground: how the visual cortex integrates local cues for global organization.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Figure-ground organization in the visual cortex is generally assumed to be based partly on general rules and partly on specific influences of object recognition in higher centers as found in the temporal lobe. To see if shape familiarity influences figure-ground organization, we tested border ownership-selective neurons in monkey V1/V2 with silhouettes of human and monkey face profiles and "nonsense" silhouettes constructed by mirror-reversing the front part of the profile. We found no superiority of face silhouettes compared with nonsense shapes in eliciting border-ownership signals overall. However, in some neurons, border-ownership signals differed strongly between the two categories consistently across many different profile shapes. Surprisingly, this category selectivity appeared as early as 70 ms after stimulus onset, which is earlier than the typical latency of shape-selective responses but compatible with the earliest face-selective responses in the inferior temporal lobe. Although our results provide no evidence for a delayed top-down influence from object recognition centers, they indicate sophisticated shape categorization mechanisms that are much faster than generally assumed. NEW & NOTEWORTHY A long-standing question is whether low-level sensory representations in cortex are influenced by cognitive "top-down" signals. We studied figure-ground organization in the visual cortex by comparing border-ownership signals for face profiles and matched nonsense shapes. We found no sign of "face superiority" in the population border-ownership signal. However, some neurons consistently differentiated between the face and nonsense categories early on, indicating the presence of shape classification mechanisms that are much faster than previously assumed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.