Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28978568›Full record

ArticleBlood2017

Extracellular fluid tonicity impacts sickle red blood cell deformability and adhesion.

Marcus A Carden, Meredith E Fay, Xinran Lu, Robert G Mannino, Yumiko Sakurai, Jordan C Ciciliano, Caroline E Hansen, Satheesh Chonat, Clinton H Joiner, David K Wood and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Hypothermal opto-thermophoretic tweezers.Nature communications · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Microfluidic methods to advance mechanistic understanding and translational research in sickle cell disease.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcus A CardenDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Aflac Cancer & Blood Disorders Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Meredith E FayDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Aflac Cancer & Blood Disorders Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Xinran LuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Robert G ManninoDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Aflac Cancer & Blood Disorders Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Yumiko SakuraiDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Aflac Cancer & Blood Disorders Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Jordan C CicilianoDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Aflac Cancer & Blood Disorders Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Caroline E HansenDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Aflac Cancer & Blood Disorders Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Satheesh ChonatDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Aflac Cancer & Blood Disorders Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Clinton H JoinerDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Aflac Cancer & Blood Disorders Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
David K WoodDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Wilbur A LamDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Aflac Cancer & Blood Disorders Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders · USEmory University · USThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering · USUniversity of Minnesota · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Translational Research SkillsU54HL112309 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LOLLAR, JOHN S. · 2012 to 2016
$12.1M
Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Acute Lung Injury in Sickle Cell DiseaseU01HL117721 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DEBAUN, MICHAEL R., JOINER, CLINTON H · 2013 to 2017
$9.4M
Developing a multiscale understanding of biophysical processes in sickle cell diseaseR01HL132906 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI WOOD, DAVID KEVIN · 2017 to 2024
$4.6M
Endothelialized microfluidics for sickle cell disease research & drug discoveryR01HL121264 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LAM, WILBUR A · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
Dissecting the origins of fetal hemoglobin modulation of sickle cell vaso-occlusionR21HL130818 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI WOOD, DAVID KEVIN · 2016 to 2017
$435k
A microfluidic platform to study sickle blood rheologyR56HL132906 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI WOOD, DAVID KEVIN · 2016 to 2016
$402k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL121264NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL132906NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL130818NHLBI NIH HHS R56 HL132906NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL117721NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL112309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abnormal sickle red blood cell (sRBC) biomechanics, including pathological deformability and adhesion, correlate with clinical severity in sickle cell disease (SCD). Clinical intravenous fluids (IVFs) of various tonicities are often used during treatment of vaso-occlusive pain episodes (VOE), the major cause of morbidity in SCD. However, evidence-based guidelines are lacking, and there is no consensus regarding which IVFs to use during VOE. Further, it is unknown how altering extracellular fluid tonicity with IVFs affects sRBC biomechanics in the microcirculation, where vaso-occlusion takes place. Here, we report how altering extracellular fluid tonicity with admixtures of clinical IVFs affects sRBC biomechanical properties by leveraging novel in vitro microfluidic models of the microcirculation, including 1 capable of deoxygenating the sRBC environment to monitor changes in microchannel occlusion risk and an "endothelialized" microvascular model that measures alterations in sRBC/endothelium adhesion under postcapillary venular conditions. Admixtures with higher tonicities (sodium = 141 mEq/L) affected sRBC biomechanics by decreasing sRBC deformability, increasing sRBC occlusion under normoxic and hypoxic conditions, and increasing sRBC adhesion in our microfluidic human microvasculature models. Admixtures with excessive hypotonicity (sodium = 103 mEq/L), in contrast, decreased sRBC adhesion, but overswelling prolonged sRBC transit times in capillary-sized microchannels. Admixtures with intermediate tonicities (sodium = 111-122 mEq/L) resulted in optimal changes in sRBC biomechanics, thereby reducing the risk for vaso-occlusion in our models. These results have significant translational implications for patients with SCD and warrant a large-scale prospective clinical study addressing optimal IVF management during VOE in SCD.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellBiomechanical PhenomenaCell AdhesionCells, CulturedErythrocyte DeformabilityErythrocytes, AbnormalExtracellular FluidHemorheologyHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsOsmolar Concentration

Identifiers

PMID28978568
PMCPMC5731085
OpenAlexW2763152481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.