Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28978353›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2017

Usefulness and engagement with a guided workbook intervention (WorkPlan) to support work related goals among cancer survivors.

Lauren Schumacher, Maria Armaou, Pauline Rolf, Steven Sadhra, Andrew John Sutton, Anjali Zarkar, Elizabeth A Grunfeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Return to Work Interventions for Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and a Methodological Critique.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cancer and work.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lauren SchumacherCoventry University, Centre for Innovative Research Across the Life Course, Coventry, UK. lauren.schumacher@coventry.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3430-1816
Maria ArmaouCoventry University, Centre for Innovative Research Across the Life Course, Coventry, UK.
Pauline RolfCoventry University, Centre for Innovative Research Across the Life Course, Coventry, UK.
Steven SadhraUniversity of Birmingham, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Birmingham, UK.
Andrew John SuttonUniversity of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK.
Anjali ZarkarUniversity Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Elizabeth A GrunfeldBirkbeck, University of London, Department of Psychological Sciences, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0613-31088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReturning to work after cancer is associated with improved physical and psychological functioning, but managing this return can be a challenging process. A workbook based intervention (WorkPlan) was developed to support return-to-work among cancer survivors. The aim of this study was to explore how participants using the workbook engaged with the intervention and utilised the content of the intervention in their plan to return-to-work.

methodsAs part of a feasibility randomised controlled trial, 23 participants from the intervention group were interviewed 4-weeks post intervention. Interviews focussed on intervention delivery and data was analysed using Framework analysis.

resultsParticipants revealed a sense of empowerment and changes in their outlook as they transitioned from patient to employee, citing the act of writing as a medium for creating their own return-to-work narrative. Participants found the generation of a return-to-work plan useful for identifying potential problems and solutions, which also served as a tool for aiding discussion with the employer on return-to-work. Additionally, participants reported feeling less uncertain and anxious about returning to work. Timing of the intervention in coordination with ongoing cancer treatments was crucial to perceived effectiveness; participants identified the sole or final treatment as the ideal time to receive the intervention.

conclusionsThe self-guided workbook supports people diagnosed with cancer to build their communication and planning skills to successfully manage their return-to-work. Further research could examine how writing plays a role in this process.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN56342476 . Retrospectively registered 14 October 2015.

Indexed as

GoalsAdultCancer SurvivorsEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPower, PsychologicalReturn to WorkCancerInterventionOncologyReturn to work

Identifiers

PMID28978353
PMCPMC5628479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.