ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2017
Attitudes toward clinical trials across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research satisfaction among participants in a preclinical Alzheimer's disease trial.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Toward Inclusive Screening of Cognitive Impairment: Validating the Visual Cognitive Assessment Test Among U.S.-Based Racially Diverse Older Adults.Journal of cross-cultural gerontology · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of a local recruitment registry in older adults in Southern California.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Perceptions about preclinical Alzheimer's disease biomarker collection procedure influences willingness to participate: Findings from an ethnoracially diverse study.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Clinical Trials Related to Familial Frontotemporal Dementia: A Qualitative Study.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2024Article
- Perceptions about dementia clinical trials among underrepresented populations: a nationally representative survey of U.S. dementia caregivers.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2024Article
- Rationale and design of the BeyeOMARKER study: prospective evaluation of blood- and eye-based biomarkers for early detection of Alzheimer's disease pathology in the eye clinic.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2024Observational
- Views and Perceptions of Amyloid Imaging in a Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Trial.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2024Article
- Recruitment of pre-dementia participants: main enrollment barriers in a longitudinal amyloid-PET study.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2023Observational
- Facilitators and Barriers to Older Adult Participation in Cancer Trials: A Qualitative Study Exploring Patient-Caregiver Dyad Congruence.JCO oncology practice · 2023Article
- Research Attitude and Interest among Cancer Survivors with or without Cognitive Impairment.Cancers · 2023Article
- Centralizing prescreening data collection to inform data-driven approaches to clinical trial recruitment.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2023Article
- Experiences of and recommendations on clinical trial design in Alzheimer's disease from the participant's point of view: a mixed-methods study in two clinical trial centers in the Netherlands.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2023Article
- Could Temperamental Features Modulate Participation in Clinical Trials?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Recruitment of older adult-caregiver dyads during the COVID-19 pandemic: an example from a study to evaluate a novel activities of daily living (ADL) sensor system.Frontiers in dementia · 2023Article
- Recruiting Persons with Dementia and Caregivers in a Clinical Trial: Dyads Perceptions.Western journal of nursing research · 2022Article
- Experiences of Participation in a Multimodal Preventive Trial MIND-ADJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2022Article
- Strategies Associated with Retaining Participants in the Longitudinal National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set Study.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2022Article
- Recruitment and retention of participant and study partner dyads in two multinational Alzheimer's disease registration trials.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2021Article
- Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of an Internet-Delivered Intervention for Insomnia in Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResearch has revealed that manifest Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia is preceded by preclinical and prodromal phases during which pathology is accumulating but function remains intact. This understanding and concern that disease-modifying interventions initiated at the dementia stage may come too late in the neurodegenerative process to be successful has led to a paradigm shift in AD clinical trials. AD trials now enroll patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and persons with no cognitive symptoms. Trial designs are similar to those enrolling dementia participants. We set out to test the hypothesis that attitudes towards trial design features differ among different potential AD trial populations.
methodsWe sent a survey composed of 37 items assessing specific trial elements to 246 cognitively normal, MCI, and AD dementia participants at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC), from whom we received 91 responses (37 cognitively normal, 32 MCI, and 22 dementia). To quantify willingness to enroll, we created three composite scenarios by summing responses and fitting proportional odds models with a binary outcome variable for whether patients were highly willing to participate in low-, moderate-, or high-risk and burden trials.
resultsMCI participants less frequently correctly self-identified their diagnoses than those with dementia or normal cognition. Compared to dementia patients, the odds of participating in a low-risk, low-burden trial were 12% lower for MCI patients (odds ratio (OR) = 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23-3.29) and 70% lower (OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.08-1.09) for cognitively normal participants. With increasing risk and burden, willingness to enroll decreased and the gap in relative willingness between diagnostic groups increased. In the medium-risk, medium-burden scenario, the estimated OR was 0.64 (95% CI 0.17-2.40) for MCI and 0.21 for the cognitively normal (95% CI 0.06-0.77). In the high-risk, high-burden scenario, the estimated OR indicated reduced willingness for MCI (OR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.06-1.15) and cognitively normal respondents (OR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.03-0.54).
conclusionsThese results suggest that AD trials enrolling predementia populations, especially those requiring frequent visits and implementing biomarker testing procedures, may encounter challenges to enrollment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.