Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28978335›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2017

Attitudes toward clinical trials across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum.

Michelle M Nuño, Daniel L Gillen, Kulwant K Dosanjh, Jenny Brook, David Elashoff, John M Ringman, Joshua D Grill

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
17.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Research satisfaction among participants in a preclinical Alzheimer's disease trial.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Views and Perceptions of Amyloid Imaging in a Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Trial.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2024
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Experiences of Participation in a Multimodal Preventive Trial MIND-ADJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle M NuñoInstitute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Daniel L GillenInstitute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Kulwant K DosanjhDivision of General Internal Medicine/Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jenny BrookDepartment of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
David ElashoffDepartment of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
John M RingmanDepartment of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Joshua D GrillInstitute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. jgrill@uci.edu.
University of California, Irvine · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

UC Irvine Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell CoreP50AG016573 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LAFERLA, FRANK M · 2000 to 2019
$37.0M
UCLA ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH CENTERP50AG016570 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CUMMINGS, JEFFREY L. · 1999 to 2014
$25.9M
NIA NIH HHS P50 AG016570NIA NIH HHS P50 AG016573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch has revealed that manifest Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia is preceded by preclinical and prodromal phases during which pathology is accumulating but function remains intact. This understanding and concern that disease-modifying interventions initiated at the dementia stage may come too late in the neurodegenerative process to be successful has led to a paradigm shift in AD clinical trials. AD trials now enroll patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and persons with no cognitive symptoms. Trial designs are similar to those enrolling dementia participants. We set out to test the hypothesis that attitudes towards trial design features differ among different potential AD trial populations.

methodsWe sent a survey composed of 37 items assessing specific trial elements to 246 cognitively normal, MCI, and AD dementia participants at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC), from whom we received 91 responses (37 cognitively normal, 32 MCI, and 22 dementia). To quantify willingness to enroll, we created three composite scenarios by summing responses and fitting proportional odds models with a binary outcome variable for whether patients were highly willing to participate in low-, moderate-, or high-risk and burden trials.

resultsMCI participants less frequently correctly self-identified their diagnoses than those with dementia or normal cognition. Compared to dementia patients, the odds of participating in a low-risk, low-burden trial were 12% lower for MCI patients (odds ratio (OR) = 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23-3.29) and 70% lower (OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.08-1.09) for cognitively normal participants. With increasing risk and burden, willingness to enroll decreased and the gap in relative willingness between diagnostic groups increased. In the medium-risk, medium-burden scenario, the estimated OR was 0.64 (95% CI 0.17-2.40) for MCI and 0.21 for the cognitively normal (95% CI 0.06-0.77). In the high-risk, high-burden scenario, the estimated OR indicated reduced willingness for MCI (OR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.06-1.15) and cognitively normal respondents (OR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.03-0.54).

conclusionsThese results suggest that AD trials enrolling predementia populations, especially those requiring frequent visits and implementing biomarker testing procedures, may encounter challenges to enrollment.

Indexed as

AttitudeAgedAlzheimer DiseaseClinical Trials as TopicCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleOdds RatioPatient Acceptance of Health CareRegression AnalysisResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesAlzheimer’s diseaseClinical trialsMild cognitive impairmentPreclinicalRecruitment

Identifiers

PMID28978335
PMCPMC5628443
OpenAlexW2761515219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.