Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28978333›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2017

Evaluating physical functioning in critical care: considerations for clinical practice and research.

Selina M Parry, Minxuan Huang, Dale M Needham

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03540732 (Feeding With Indirect Calorimetry and Cycling in the Elderly Intensive Care Patient), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03540732 naunknown statusnot on this map

Feeding With Indirect Calorimetry and Cycling in the Elderly Intensive Care Patient

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational University Hospital, SingaporeRan2017 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsCalorimetry, Indirect, Exercise Therapy, Critical Care, Muscular AtrophyArmsIndirect Calorimetry directed feeding., Cycle Ergometry
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Selina M ParryDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Minxuan HuangOutcomes after Critical Illness and Surgery Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Dale M NeedhamOutcomes after Critical Illness and Surgery Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. dale.needham@jhmi.edu.

Funding

Improving Long-Term Outcomes Clinical Research for Acute Respiratory FailureR24HL111895 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI NEEDHAM, DALE MURRAY · 2013 to 2017
$5.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R24 HL111895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of physical functioning is valuable in the intensive care unit (ICU) to help inform patient recovery after critical illness, to identify patients who may require rehabilitation interventions, and to monitor responsiveness to such interventions. This viewpoint article discusses: (1) the concept of physical functioning with reference to the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; (2) the importance of measuring physical functioning in the ICU; and (3) methods for evaluating physical functioning in the ICU. Recommendations for clinical practice and research are made, along with discussion of future directions.

Indexed as

Health StatusCritical CareCritical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsPhysical ExaminationCritical illnessEarly mobilityOutcome measurementPhysical functionPhysical rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID28978333
PMCPMC5628423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.