Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28977693›Full record

ReviewBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2017

Nanog Expression in Embryonic Stem Cells - An Ideal Model System to Dissect Enhancer Function.

Steven Blinka, Sridhar Rao

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Odontogenic Differentiation-Induced Tooth Regeneration byCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Characterization of Alternative Splicing (AS) Events during Chicken (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  11. Super-Enhancers and CTCF in Early Embryonic Cell Fate Decisions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven BlinkaDepartment of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and Anatomy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Sridhar RaoDepartment of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and Anatomy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Medical College of Wisconsin · USVersiti Blood Center of Wisconsin · US

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM080202 · NIGMS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI BARBIERI, JOSEPH T, SALZMAN, NITA H · 2010 to 2024
$5.7M
Cohesin Mutations in Acute Myelogenous LeukemiaR01CA204231 · NCI · VERSITI WISCONSIN, INC. · PI RAO, SRIDHAR · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Enhancer Transcribed RNAs: Function and Mechanism in HematopoiesisF30DK103502 · NIDDK · VERSITI WISCONSIN, INC. · PI BLINKA, STEVEN · 2015 to 2018
$189k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204231NIDDK NIH HHS F30 DK103502NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM080202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are derived from the preimplantation embryo and can differentiate into virtually any other cell type (termed pluripotency), which is governed by lineage specific transcriptions factors (TFs) binding to cis regulatory elements (CREs) to mediate changes in gene expression. The reliance on transcriptional regulation to maintain pluripotency makes ESCs a valuable model to study the role of distal CREs such as enhancers in modulating gene expression to affect cell fate decisions. This review will highlight recent advance on transcriptional enhancers, focusing on studies performed in ESCs. In addition, we argue that the Nanog locus, which encodes for an ESC-critical TF, is particularly informative because it contains multiple co-regulated genes and enhancers in close proximity to one another. The unique landscape at Nanog permits the study of ongoing questions including whether multiple enhancers function additively versus synergistically, determinants of gene specificity, and cell-to-cell variability in gene expression.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenomeAnimalsCell DifferentiationGenetic LociHistonesMiceModels, GeneticMouse Embryonic Stem CellsNanog Homeobox ProteinOctamer Transcription Factor-3Pluripotent Stem CellsSOXB1 Transcription FactorsTranscription, GeneticHistonesNanog Homeobox ProteinNanog protein, mouseOctamer Transcription Factor-3Pou5f1 protein, mouseSox2 protein, mouseSOXB1 Transcription Factorsembryonic stem cellseRNAshigher order chromosome structureloopingsuper-enhancerstranscriptional regulation

Identifiers

PMID28977693
PMCPMC5878941
OpenAlexW2763155429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.