Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28977308›Full record

SynthesisRevista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo

SURVEILLANCE OF CHILD DEVELOPMENT: AN ANALYSIS OF BRAZIL'S SITUATION.

Maria de Fátima Costa Caminha, Suzana Lins da Silva, Marília de Carvalho Lima, Pedro Tadeu Álvares Costa Caminha de Azevedo, Maria Cristina Dos Santos Figueira, Malaquias Batista

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Is there a relationship between parental concern and suspicion of developmental delay?Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria de Fátima Costa CaminhaPrograma Nacional de Pós-Doutorado (PNPD) da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) no Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira (IMIP), Recife, PE, Brasil.
Suzana Lins da SilvaIMIP, Recife, PE, Brasil.
Marília de Carvalho LimaUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, PE, Brasil.
Pedro Tadeu Álvares Costa Caminha de AzevedoFaculdade Pernambucana de Saúde (FPS), Recife, PE, Brasil.
Maria Cristina Dos Santos FigueiraFaculdade Pernambucana de Saúde (FPS), Recife, PE, Brasil.
Malaquias BatistaIMIP, Recife, PE, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe Brazil's historical background with regard to child development surveillance and perform a systematic review of studies published on surveillance records of child development within Child Health Handbooks. DATA SOURCES: A literature review was conducted in April of 2016 in the following electronic databases: Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (LILACS), the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), and the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline). The search did not have any language or publication period restrictions, and included the bibliographic references of the selected articles. The keywords "child development and child health records," and "child development and child health handbook" were applied. Articles were included that were original and that evaluated the use of child development surveillance tools in Brazil. Publications that were not original were excluded. The articles were selected first based on their title, then their abstracts, and finally a thorough reading. DATA SYNTHESIS: The recommendation to support child development surveillance has been occurring since 1984. In 1995, developmental milestones were included in the Child's Health Handbook, and in 2004 they became normative acts for surveillance, which should be carried out using this booklet. In the systematic review, six articles were selected in which the prevalence of child development surveillance recording ranged from 4.6 to 30.4%. This variation was due to different criteria and sample sizes as well as different methodologies employed to analyze the adequacy of filling out the handbook.

conclusionsDespite the fact that the Brazilian Ministry of Health formalized child development surveillance 32 years ago, the act of recording the surveillance in the Child Health Handbook is still deficient and irregular.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentBrazilChildHumansPopulation Surveillance

Identifiers

PMID28977308
PMCPMC5417801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.