Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28977017›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Real-time assessment of corneal endothelial cell damage following graft preparation and donor insertion for DMEK.

Maninder Bhogal, Chan N Lwin, Xin-Yi Seah, Elavazhagan Murugan, Khadijah Adnan, Shu-Jun Lin, Gary Peh, Jodhbir S Mehta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Establishment of an Ex Vivo Human Corneal Endothelium Wound Model.Translational vision science & technology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maninder BhogalSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Chan N LwinSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Xin-Yi SeahSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Elavazhagan MuruganSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Khadijah AdnanSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Shu-Jun LinSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Gary PehSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5387-4209
Jodhbir S MehtaSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Singapore Eye Research Institute · SGSingapore National Eye Center · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo establish a method for assessing graft viability, in-vivo, following corneal transplantation.

methodsOptimization of calcein AM fluorescence and toxicity assessment was performed in cultured human corneal endothelial cells and ex-vivo corneal tissue. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty grafts were incubated with calcein AM and imaged pre and post preparation, and in-situ after insertion and unfolding in a pig eye model. Global, macroscopic images of the entire graft and individual cell resolution could be attained by altering the magnification of a clinical confocal scanning laser microscope. Patterns of cell loss observed in situ were compared to those seen using standard ex-vivo techniques.

resultsCalcein AM showed a positive dose-fluorescence relationship. A dose of 2.67μmol was sufficient to allow clear discrimination between viable and non-viable areas (sensitivity of 96.6% with a specificity of 96.1%) and was not toxic to cultured endothelial cells or ex-vivo corneal tissue. Patterns of cell loss seen in-situ closely matched those seen on ex-vivo assessment with fluorescence viability imaging, trypan blue/alizarin red staining or scanning electron microscopy. Iatrogenic graft damage from preparation and insertion varied between 7-35% and incarceration of the graft tissue within surgical wounds was identified as a significant cause of endothelial damage.

conclusionsIn-situ graft viability assessment using clinical imaging devices provides comparable information to ex-vivo methods. This method shows high sensitivity and specificity, is non-toxic and can be used to evaluate immediate cell viability in new grafting techniques in-vivo.

Indexed as

Tissue DonorsAdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsCells, CulturedCorneal Endothelial Cell LossDescemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyFemaleFluoresceinsHumansMaleMicroscopy, FluorescenceMiddle AgedModels, AnimalSwinecalcein AMFluoresceins

Identifiers

PMID28977017
PMCPMC5627903
OpenAlexW2763675866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.