ArticlePloS one2017
Bereavement support for family caregivers: The gap between guidelines and practice in palliative care.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.
- Family Bereavement Support Interventions in Specialist Adult Palliative Care: A Rapid Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Pooled it
- Understanding the palliative care needs and experiences of people with mesothelioma and their family carers: An integrative systematic review.Palliative medicine · 2021Pooled it
- The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hospital-based specialist palliative care for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Efficacy of an Online Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy in Caregivers of Advanced Cancer (eMCP-C): A Mixed-Method Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Psycho-oncology · 2026Trial
- Beyond grief: Quantifying bereavement needs of rural family caregivers.Palliative & supportive care · 2025Trial
- When Is the Best Time to Deliver Supportive Interventions to Hospice Family Caregivers? A Multi-Method Study.The Gerontologist · 2025Trial
- Attitudes toward bereavement support and associated factors in the Japanese population: a cross-sectional study.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Meaning-centered psychotherapy for Chinese caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: Cultural and linguistic adaptation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Content, timing, participants and documented outcomes of family meetings in a specialist palliative care unit in Portugal: a retrospective descriptive study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Bereavement Groups for Parents Who Have Lost a Child: A Qualitative Study of Parental Experiences in a Danish Context.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2026Article
- Grief after the death of a close relative: a study of associated factors and perceptions of bereavement support.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Misconceptions on Grief and Bereaved People's Needs Among Health and Social Care Professionals, Teachers and General Population in Italy.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- German-language adaptation of the Bereavement Risk Assessment Tool (BRAT): findings on the inter-rater reliability.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Post-Mortem Grief Care for Family Caregivers After Home-Based End-of-Life Care: A Scoping Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Review
- Shifting the aged care culture from caring "for" residents to caring "about" residents: Advocating for a compassionate communities approach to care.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Patients' and relatives' perspectives on the quality of end-of-Life care in advanced cancer: From the final months to bereavement.PloS one · 2026Article
- "I thought he had longer than that": family caregivers' experiences of grief, loss, and bereavement in residential aged care.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- A qualitative exploration of the impact of healthcare pre- and post-death on bereavement experiences.Palliative & supportive care · 2025Article
- Awareness of Care Managers Concerning Grief Care for Older Bereaved Individuals Living Alone Following the Loss of Their Spouse: A Qualitative Research.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- The Potential Role of Palliative Care and Hospice in Addressing Prolonged Grief Disorder in the United States.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2025Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStandards for bereavement care propose that support should be matched to risk and need. However, studies in many countries demonstrate that palliative care services continue to adopt a generic approach in offering support to bereaved families.
objectiveTo identify patterns of bereavement support in palliative care services based upon the experience of bereaved people from a population based survey and in relation to clinical practice guidelines.
designAn anonymous postal survey collected information from clients of six funeral providers in four Australian states (2014-15), 6 to 24 months after the death of their family member or friend, with 1,139 responding. Responses from 506 bereaved relatives of people who had terminal illnesses were analysed. Of these, 298 had used palliative care services and 208 had not.
resultsMore people with cancer (64%) had received palliative care in comparison to other illnesses such as heart disease, dementia and organ failure (4-10%). The support for family caregivers before and after their relative's death was not considered optimal. Only 39.4% of the bereaved reported being specifically asked about their emotional/ psychological distress pre-bereavement, and just half of the bereaved perceived they had enough support from palliative care services. Half of the bereaved had a follow up contact from the service at 3-6 weeks, and a quarter had a follow-up at 6 months. Their qualitative feedback underlined the limited helpfulness of the blanket approach to bereavement support, which was often described as "not personal" or "generic", or "just standard practice".
conclusionsTimeliness and consistency of relationship is crucial to building rapport and trust in the service's ability to help at post-bereavement as well as a focus on the specific rather than the generic needs of the bereaved. In light of these limitations, palliative care services might do better investing their efforts principally in assessing and supporting family caregivers during the pre-bereavement period and developing community capacity and referral pathways for bereavement care. Our findings suggest that bereavement support in Australian palliative care services has only a tenuous relationship with guidelines and assessment tools, a conclusion also drawn in studies from other countries, emphasizing the international implications of our study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.