Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28976928›Full record

ReviewNutrients2017

Intended or Unintended Doping? A Review of the Presence of Doping Substances in Dietary Supplements Used in Sports.

José Miguel Martínez-Sanz, Isabel Sospedra, Christian Mañas Ortiz, Eduard Baladía, Angel Gil-Izquierdo, Rocio Ortiz-Moncada

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Caffeine's influence on vertical jump height: a real-life collegiate student-athlete approach.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2025
    Trial
  5. The Effects of 6 Weeks ofNutrients · 2021
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

José Miguel Martínez-SanzNursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain. josemiguel.ms@ua.es.ORCID 0000-0001-9054-3858
Isabel SospedraNursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain. isospedra@ua.es.ORCID 0000-0002-8513-8986
Christian Mañas OrtizPharmacy faculty, University of Valencia, 46100 Valencia, Spain. e.baladia@academianutricion.org.ORCID 0000-0002-8123-8736
Eduard BaladíaResearch Group on Food and Nutrition (ALINUT), University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain. angelgil@cebas.csic.es.ORCID 0000-0001-7646-0386
Angel Gil-IzquierdoResearch Group on Food and Nutrition (ALINUT), University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain. rocio.ortiz@ua.es.
Rocio Ortiz-MoncadaResearch Group on Food and Nutrition (ALINUT), University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain. christianmanas@hotmail.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe use of dietary supplements is increasing among athletes, year after year. Related to the high rates of use, unintentional doping occurs. Unintentional doping refers to positive anti-doping tests due to the use of any supplement containing unlisted substances banned by anti-doping regulations and organizations, such as the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). The objective of this review is to summarize the presence of unlabeled doping substances in dietary supplements that are used in sports. METHODOLOGY: A review of substances/metabolites/markers banned by WADA in ergonutritional supplements was completed using PubMed. The inclusion criteria were studies published up until September 2017, which analyzed the content of substances, metabolites and markers banned by WADA.

results446 studies were identified, 23 of which fulfilled all the inclusion criteria. In most of the studies, the purpose was to identify doping substances in dietary supplements. DISCUSSION: Substances prohibited by WADA were found in most of the supplements analyzed in this review. Some of them were prohormones and/or stimulants. With rates of contamination between 12 and 58%, non-intentional doping is a point to take into account before establishing a supplementation program. Athletes and coaches must be aware of the problems related to the use of any contaminated supplement and should pay special attention before choosing a supplement, informing themselves fully and confirming the guarantees offered by the supplement.

Indexed as

Doping in SportsAnabolic AgentsAthletesDietary SupplementsHumansSportsAnabolic Agentsdietary supplementsdopingergonutritional aidsWADA

Identifiers

PMID28976928
PMCPMC5691710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.