ArticleNature reviews. Urology2017
Prostate cancer: Foxy-5 in prostate cancer model.
Article in Nature reviews. Urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergistic targeting strategies for prostate cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025Review
- Deciphering the Tumor Microenvironment in Prostate Cancer: A Focus on the Stromal Component.Cancers · 2024Review
- Cancer-associated fibroblasts and prostate cancer stem cells: crosstalk mechanisms and implications for disease progression.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- The Molecular Biology of Prostate Cancer Stem Cells: From the Past to the Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Targeting signaling pathways in prostate cancer: mechanisms and clinical trials.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022Review
- Role of prostate cancer stem-like cells in the development of antiandrogen resistance.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2022Review
- Emerging role of tumor cell plasticity in modifying therapeutic response.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28976499What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.