Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28976219›Full record

ReviewCritical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology2018

Finding the needle in the haystack: towards solving the protein-folding problem computationally.

Bian Li, Michaela Fooksa, Sten Heinze, Jens Meiler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biology and medicine in the landscape of quantum advantages.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Refolding of Lysozyme in Glycerol as Studied by Fast Scanning Calorimetry.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bian Lia Department of Chemistry , Vanderbilt University , Nashville , TN , USA.
Michaela Fooksab Center for Structural Biology , Vanderbilt University , Nashville , TN , USA.
Sten Heinzea Department of Chemistry , Vanderbilt University , Nashville , TN , USA.
Jens Meilera Department of Chemistry , Vanderbilt University , Nashville , TN , USA.

Funding

Decrypting Variants of Uncertain Significance in Long-QT SyndromeR01HL122010 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGE, ALFRED L., SANDERS, CHARLES R · 2014 to 2025
$15.5M
MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICS TRAINING PROGRAM AT VANDERBILTT32GM008320 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CHAZIN, WALTER J. · 1989 to 2023
$7.9M
ROSETTA An Integrated Protein Structure Modeling SuiteR01GM073151 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KUHLMAN, BRIAN A · 2005 to 2019
$7.8M
Genetic Modifiers of Congenital Long QT SyndromeR01HL068880 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGE, ALFRED L. · 2001 to 2011
$4.8M
Membrane Protein Structure Elucidation from sparse NMR data (KAMP)R01GM080403 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MEILER, JENS · 2007 to 2019
$3.0M
Computational Design of Protein-Ligand Interfaces - a Therapeutic StrategyR01GM099842 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MEILER, JENS · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
Small Molecule Probes to Investigate Structure and Function of Y ReceptorsR01DK097376 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MEILER, JENS, WEAVER, C DAVID · 2013 to 2015
$1.0M
High-Performance Computer Cluster for Biomedical ResearchS10OD023680 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MEILER, JENS · 2017 to 2017
$587k
GPU-Accelerated Parallel Computer for Drug Discovery ApplicationsS10OD020154 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, JARROD ANSON · 2015 to 2015
$225k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL068880NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL122010NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK097376NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073151NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080403NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099842NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008320NIH HHS S10 OD023680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction of protein tertiary structures from amino acid sequence and understanding the mechanisms of how proteins fold, collectively known as "the protein folding problem," has been a grand challenge in molecular biology for over half a century. Theories have been developed that provide us with an unprecedented understanding of protein folding mechanisms. However, computational simulation of protein folding is still difficult, and prediction of protein tertiary structure from amino acid sequence is an unsolved problem. Progress toward a satisfying solution has been slow due to challenges in sampling the vast conformational space and deriving sufficiently accurate energy functions. Nevertheless, several techniques and algorithms have been adopted to overcome these challenges, and the last two decades have seen exciting advances in enhanced sampling algorithms, computational power and tertiary structure prediction methodologies. This review aims at summarizing these computational techniques, specifically conformational sampling algorithms and energy approximations that have been frequently used to study protein-folding mechanisms or to de novo predict protein tertiary structures. We hope that this review can serve as an overview on how the protein-folding problem can be studied computationally and, in cases where experimental approaches are prohibitive, help the researcher choose the most relevant computational approach for the problem at hand. We conclude with a summary of current challenges faced and an outlook on potential future directions.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingAlgorithmsAnimalsHumansKineticsMolecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsProtein Structure, TertiaryThermodynamicsProteinsconformational sampling algorithmsprotein energy approximationsProtein-folding problemprotein-folding simulationprotein structure predictionsparse experimental data

Identifiers

PMID28976219
PMCPMC6790072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.