ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2017
Electrophysiological evidence for differences between fusion and combination illusions in audiovisual speech perception.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hearing, seeing, and feeling speech: the neurophysiological correlates of trimodal speech perception.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Want to quickly adapt to distorted speech and become a better listener? Read lips, not text.PloS one · 2022Article
- Audio-visual combination of syllables involves time-sensitive dynamics following from fusion failure.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Neural Correlates of Modality-Sensitive Deviance Detection in the Audiovisual Oddball Paradigm.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Fixating the eyes of a speaker provides sufficient visual information to modulate early auditory processing.Biological psychology · 2019Article
- No "Self" Advantage for Audiovisual Speech Aftereffects.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Incongruent audiovisual speech stimuli can lead to perceptual illusions such as fusions or combinations. Here, we investigated the underlying audiovisual integration process by measuring ERPs. We observed that visual speech-induced suppression of P2 amplitude (which is generally taken as a measure of audiovisual integration) for fusions was similar to suppression obtained with fully congruent stimuli, whereas P2 suppression for combinations was larger. We argue that these effects arise because the phonetic incongruency is solved differently for both types of stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.