Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28975881›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2017

U.S. Regulatory Considerations for Development of Live Biotherapeutic Products as Drugs.

Sheila M Dreher-Lesnick, Scott Stibitz, Paul E Carlson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sheila M Dreher-LesnickDivision of Bacterial, Parasitic, and Allergenic Products, Office of Vaccines Research and Review, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993.
Scott StibitzDivision of Bacterial, Parasitic, and Allergenic Products, Office of Vaccines Research and Review, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993.
Paul E CarlsonDivision of Bacterial, Parasitic, and Allergenic Products, Office of Vaccines Research and Review, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interest in the use of bacteria-containing products for the treatment or prevention of disease has increased in recent years. Bacterial preparations for human consumption are commercially available in the form of dietary supplements and typically contain strains with a history of use in food fermentation. Advances in our understanding of the role of the microbiota in health and disease are likely to lead to development of products containing more novel bacterial species, along with genetic modification of strains to provide specific functions. By law, any substance intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in humans meets the definition of a drug, and an Investigational New Drug (IND) application for clinical investigation must be filed with the FDA. This article is meant to provide information about the IND submission process and additional considerations with regard to chemistry, manufacturing, and controls information for live biotherapeutic products.

Indexed as

Investigational New Drug ApplicationBacteriaBiological ProductsBiological TherapyDrug ApprovalDrug DesignHumansManufacturing and Industrial FacilitiesMicrobiotaMicroorganisms, Genetically-ModifiedUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID28975881
PMCPMC11687541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.