Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28975679›Full record

ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2018

An Emergency Department Observation Unit Is a Feasible Setting for Multidisciplinary Geriatric Assessments in Compliance With the Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines.

Lauren T Southerland, Anthony J Vargas, Lalitha Nagaraj, Tanya R Gure, Jeffery M Caterino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Physical and Occupational Therapist Evaluations for Fall Prevention in the Emergency Department: A Geriatric ED Guidelines 2.0 Systematic Review.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Team-based, Multidisciplinary Care in the Emergency Department.Emergency medicine clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Implementation of geriatric screening in the emergency department using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2023
    Article
  16. Do we really need another risk prediction rule? Yes, we do.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lauren T SoutherlandDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Anthony J VargasThe Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH.
Lalitha NagarajDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Tanya R GureDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Jeffery M CaterinoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Funding

Urine antimicrobial proteins in older adults: aging, infection, & innate immunityR01AG050801 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CATERINO, JEFFREY M · 2016 to 2020
$2.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG050801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Geriatric Emergency Department (ED) Guidelines recommend providing multidisciplinary geriatric assessment in the ED, but these assessments can be difficult to coordinate and may prolong length of stay. Patients who need longer than a typical ED stay can be placed in an ED observation unit (Obs Unit). We investigated the effects of offering multidisciplinary assessments for ED patients in an Obs Unit.

methodsEvaluation by a geriatric hospital consultation team, physical therapist, case manager, and/or pharmacist was made available to all Obs Unit patients. Use of any or all of these ancillary consult services could be requested by the Obs Unit physician. A retrospective chart review of random older adult Obs Unit patients was done to assess rates of consult use and interventions by these consulting teams. All patients ≥ 65 years old in our institutional review board-approved, monthly Obs Unit quality database from October 2015 through March 2017 were included.

resultsOur quality database included 221 older patients over 18 months. The mean (±SD) age was 73.3 (±6.8) years (range = 65-96 years) and 55.2% were women. The mean (±SD) observation length of stay was 14.7 (±6.5) hours. The majority (74.3%) were discharged from the Obs Unit and 72-hour ED recidivism was 3.6%. Overall, at least one of the multidisciplinary consultant services were requested in 40.3% of patients (n = 89). Additional interventions or services were recommended in 80.0% of patients evaluated by physical therapy (32 of 40 patients), 100% of those evaluated by a pharmacist (five of five patients), 38% of those evaluated by case management (27 of 71 patients), and 100% of those evaluated by a geriatrician (eight of eight patients). Only 5.4% (n = 12) of patients were placed in observation specifically for multidisciplinary assessment; these patients had a mean (±SD) length of stay of 12.2 (±5) hours and an admission rate of 41.7%.

conclusionsIncorporating elements of multidisciplinary geriatric assessment for older patients is feasible within an observation time frame and resulted in targeted interventions. An Obs Unit is a reasonable setting to offer services in compliance with the Geriatric ED Guidelines.

Indexed as

Clinical Observation UnitsEmergency Service, HospitalAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGeriatric AssessmentGuidelines as TopicHumansLength of StayMalePatient DischargeRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID28975679
PMCPMC5764784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.