Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28975658›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2018

Current and novel injectable hydrogels to treat focal chondral lesions: Properties and applicability.

Cecilia Pascual-Garrido, Francisco Rodriguez-Fontan, Elizabeth A Aisenbrey, Karin A Payne, Jorge Chahla, Laurie R Goodrich, Stephanie J Bryant

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Advanced injectable hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  13. Therapeutic application of hydrogels for bone-related diseases.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Synthetic alternatives to Matrigel.Nature reviews. Materials · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cecilia Pascual-GarridoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Francisco Rodriguez-FontanDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Elizabeth A AisenbreyDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado Denver, Boulder, Colorado.
Karin A PayneDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Jorge ChahlaSteadman Philippon Research lnstitute, Vail, Colorado.
Laurie R GoodrichDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Orthopaedic Research Center, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Stephanie J BryantDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado Denver, Boulder, Colorado.

Funding

Personalizing Matrix Assisted Autologous Chondrocyte ImplantationR01AR065441 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI BRYANT, STEPHANIE J · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR065441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focal chondral lesions and early osteoarthritis (OA) are responsible for progressive joint pain and disability in millions of people worldwide, yet there is currently no surgical joint preservation treatment available to fully restore the long term functionality of cartilage. Limitations of current treatments for cartilage defects have prompted the field of cartilage tissue engineering, which seeks to integrate engineering and biological principles to promote the growth of new cartilage to replace damaged tissue. Toward improving cartilage repair, hydrogel design has advanced in recent years to improve their utility. Injectable hydrogels have emerged as a promising scaffold due to their wide range of properties, the ability to encapsulate cells within the material, and their ability to provide cues for cell differentiation. Some of these advances include the development of improved control over in situ gelation (e.g., light), new techniques to process hydrogels (e.g., multi-layers), and better incorporation of biological signals (e.g., immobilization, controlled release, and tethering). This review summarises the innovative approaches to engineer injectable hydrogels toward cartilage repair. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:64-75, 2018.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsAnimalsCartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesChondrocytesHumansHydrogelsInjectionsStem CellsTissue EngineeringHydrogelsfocal chondral lesionshydrogelorthopedicsosteoarthritistissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID28975658
PMCPMC5839960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.