Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28975494›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2017

Significant decrease of mortality due to anastomotic leaks following esophageal resection: management makes the difference.

Anja Schaible, Thorsten Brenner, Ulf Hinz, Thomas Schmidt, Markus Weigand, Peter Sauer, Markus W Büchler, Alexis Ulrich

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anja SchaibleDepartment of General Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, INF 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. Anja.Schaible@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9271-4139
Thorsten BrennerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ulf HinzDepartment of General Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, INF 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas SchmidtDepartment of General Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, INF 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus WeigandDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter SauerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus W BüchlerDepartment of General Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, INF 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexis UlrichDepartment of General Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, INF 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnastomotic leakage is the most frequent cause of postoperative mortality following esophageal surgery. However, no gold standard for diagnosing and managing leakage has been established. Continuous clinical judgment is extremely important; therefore, to optimize the management of leakage, we established a special group for decision-making in cases of suspected leakage in the early postoperative period.

methodsBetween January 2010 and December 2016, 234 consecutive patients underwent elective esophageal resection with a thoracoabdominal incision. In 2014, we established a group consisting of a surgeon, surgical endoscopist, and anesthesiologist for decision-making in cases of suspected leakage. They discussed emerging problems and decided on further diagnostics or therapy. The data were documented prospectively and compared to the years prior to 2014.

resultsTwo hundred and thirty-four consecutive patients were enrolled in the study, 110 in the years 2010-2013 (group A), and 124 in the years 2014-2016 (group B). Neither patients' characteristics nor the rate of anastomotic leakage differed significantly between the two study groups. The hospital mortality rate was 10% (11 patients) in group A and 4.8% (six patients) in group B. Most interestingly, mortality due to anastomotic leakage was 35% in group A (9/26), whereas it decreased significantly to 6.5% (2/31 patients) (P < 0.001) in group B.

conclusionsOur data clearly demonstrated that optimizing the management of anastomotic leakage by making team decisions can lead to a significant decrease in mortality.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnastomotic LeakClinical Decision-MakingClinical ProtocolsEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative CareRetrospective StudiesAnastomotic leakageEndoscopyEsophageal resectionMortality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.