ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2017
Measurement of dark adaptometry during ISCEV standard flash electroretinography.
Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phenotypic characterization of retinitis pigmentosa associated with deafnessBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDark adaptometry (DA) is a sensitive test for diagnosis of retinal disease. Patients requiring flash electroretinograms (ERGs) benefit from DA for proper diagnosis. Our purpose was to develop a DA test to be administered during the 20-min dark adaptation period of the flash ERG ( www.iscev.org ) using alternating red and blue stimuli to bias responses in favor of cones (red) and rods (blue).
methodsAn ERG Ganzfeld was used to measure DA in 21 normal subjects and 21 patients with retinal disease. Subjects underwent 75 s of preadaptation followed by 20 min of DA using an adaptive staircase to detect alternating flashes of red and blue light. Normative red and blue DA was compared to patients at the 10-min midpoint and 20-min final threshold.
resultsAt 15 min, normals and patients showed asymptotic plateaus; hence, final thresholds were achieved within 15 min for parameters of this study. In RP and allied conditions (n = 11), 100% showed significantly elevated blue DA thresholds (> 2SD above normal) at 10 and 20 min. In cone diseases, 80% showed abnormal red DA at 10 min and 30% at 20 min, indicating that delayed adaptation is more typical of cone disease.
conclusionsTwo-color DA is expediently measured during the DA phase of ERGs providing clinical data which separate rod and cone dysfunction critical for accurate diagnosis of various retinal diseases. It provides an additional benchmark for monitoring function over time and invaluable guidance for patients functioning in dimly lit settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.