ArticleJAMA2017
Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in the US Medicare Population, 1999-2014.
Article in JAMA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cost-Effectiveness of Carotid Endarterectomy vs. Carotid Stenting: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Translational stroke research · 2025Pooled it
- Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Treatment of carotid stenosis in asymptomatic, nonoctogenarian, standard risk patients with stenting versus endarterectomy trials.Journal of vascular surgery · 2022Trial
- Comparative Effectiveness of Carotid Endarterectomy vs Initial Medical Therapy in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.JAMA neurology · 2020Trial
- Impact of the Medicare carotid stenting national coverage determination on procedure utilization and long-term stroke risk after carotid revascularization.Journal of vascular surgery · 2026Article
- DSA Versus Noninvasive Imaging in Revascularization Referral for Recently Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Predictors of postoperative stroke after transfemoral carotid artery stenting.Journal of vascular surgery · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of Transcarotid vs Transfemoral Carotid Stenting for Stroke Prevention.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Racial Differences in Adoption and Outcomes of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization among High-Risk Adults with Carotid Artery Stenosis.Annals of vascular surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical and radiological profie changes of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy over 40 years.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Association Between Hospital Policy on Local Versus General Anesthesia, and Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy: Secondary Data Analysis of the German Statutory Carotid Quality Assurance Database.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Appropriateness of care: Asymptomatic carotid stenosis including transcarotid artery revascularization.Seminars in vascular surgery · 2024Review
- Significance of atherosclerotic plaque location in recanalizing non-acute long-segment occlusion of the internal carotid artery.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians compared to their younger counterparts: a retrospective observational study.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2024Article
- CREST-2 Reaches A Surgical Milestone.Journal of vascular surgery · 2024Article
- Intravascular lithotripsy prior to transcarotid arterial revascularization: A technical tale of two cases.SAGE open medical case reports · 2024Article
- Curve-centered plaques raise the risk of peri-operative neurological and cardiovascular complications during angioplasty and stenting for severe carotid stenosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Article
- Hemodynamic Changes in Patients with Chronic Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion After Recanalization.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2023Article
- Association of a Positive Drug Screening for Cannabis With Mortality and Hospital Visits Among Veterans Affairs Enrollees Prescribed Opioids.JAMA network open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting are the leading approaches to revascularization for carotid stenosis, yet contemporary data on trends in rates and outcomes are limited. Objective: To describe US national trends in performance and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy and stenting among Medicare beneficiaries from 1999 to 2014. Design, Setting, and Participants: Serial cross-sectional analysis of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years or older from 1999 to 2014 using the Medicare Inpatient and Denominator files. Spatial mixed models adjusted for age, sex, and race were fit to calculate county-specific risk-standardized revascularization rates. Mixed models were fit to assess trends in outcomes after adjustment for demographics, comorbidities, and symptomatic status. Exposures: Carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting. Main Outcomes and Measures: Revascularization rates per 100 000 beneficiary-years of fee-for-service enrollment, in-hospital mortality, 30-day stroke or death, 30-day stroke, myocardial infarction, or death, 30-day all-cause mortality, and 1-year stroke. Results: During the study, 937 111 unique patients underwent carotid endarterectomy (mean age, 75.8 years; 43% women) and 231 077 underwent carotid artery stenting (mean age, 75.4 years; 49% women). There were 81 306 patients who underwent endarterectomy in 1999 and 36 325 in 2014; national rates per 100 000 beneficiary-years decreased from 298 in 1999-2000 to 128 in 2013-2014 (P < .001). The number of patients who underwent stenting ranged from 10 416 in 1999 to 22 865 in 2006 (an increase per 100 000 beneficiary-years from 40 in 1999-2000 to 75 in 2005-2006; P < .001); by 2014, there were 10 208 patients who underwent stenting and the rate decreased to 38 per 100 000 beneficiary-years (P < .001). Outcomes improved over time despite increases in vascular risk factors (eg, hypertension prevalence increased from 67% to 81% among patients who underwent endarterectomy and from 61% to 70% among patients who underwent stenting) and the proportion of symptomatic patients (all P < .001). There were adjusted annual decreases in 30-day ischemic stroke or death of 2.90% (95% CI, 2.63% to 3.18%) among patients who underwent endarterectomy and 1.13% (95% CI, 0.71% to 1.54%) among patients who underwent stenting; an absolute decrease from 1999 to 2014 was observed for endarterectomy (1.4%; 95% CI, 1.2% to 1.5%) but not stenting (-0.1%; 95% CI, -0.5% to 0.4%). Rates for 1-year ischemic stroke decreased after endarterectomy (absolute decrease, 3.5% [95% CI, 3.2% to 3.7%]; adjusted annual decrease, 2.17% [95% CI, 2.00% to 2.34%]) and stenting (absolute decrease, 1.6% [95% CI, 1.2% to 2.1%]; adjusted annual decrease, 1.86% [95% CI, 1.45%-2.26%]). Additional improvements were noted for in-hospital mortality, 30-day stroke, myocardial infarction, or death, and 30-day all-cause mortality as well as within demographic subgroups. Conclusions and Relevance: Among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries, the performance of carotid endarterectomy declined from 1999 to 2014, whereas the performance of carotid artery stenting increased until 2006 and then declined from 2007 to 2014. Outcomes improved despite increases in vascular risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.