Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28975306›Full record

ArticleJAMA2017

Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in the US Medicare Population, 1999-2014.

Judith H Lichtman, Michael R Jones, Erica C Leifheit, Alice J Sheffet, George Howard, Brajesh K Lal, Virginia J Howard, Yun Wang, Jeptha Curtis, Thomas G Brott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. CREST-2 Reaches A Surgical Milestone.Journal of vascular surgery · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Judith H LichtmanDepartment of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Michael R JonesCardiology Division, Baptist Health Lexington, Lexington, Kentucky.
Erica C LeifheitDepartment of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Alice J SheffetDepartment of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark.
George HowardDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama, Birmingham.
Brajesh K LalDepartment of Vascular Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore.
Virginia J HowardDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama, Birmingham.
Yun WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jeptha CurtisCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Thomas G BrottDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Yale University · USCentral Baptist Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Alabama · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USYale New Haven Hospital · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial: Long Term Follow-upU01NS038384 · NINDS · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI BROTT, THOMAS G, SHEFFET, ALICE J · 2011 to 2016
$15.4M
Center for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research at Yale UniversityU01HL105270 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CURTIS, JEPTHA PELHAM, KRUMHOLZ, HARLAN MARC · 2010 to 2013
$5.8M
Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Cognitive Function and Plaque Correlates - 2I01CX001621 · VA · BALTIMORE VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI LAL, BRAJESH K · 2017 to 2021
–
CSRD VA I01 CX001621NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL105270NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS038384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting are the leading approaches to revascularization for carotid stenosis, yet contemporary data on trends in rates and outcomes are limited. Objective: To describe US national trends in performance and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy and stenting among Medicare beneficiaries from 1999 to 2014. Design, Setting, and Participants: Serial cross-sectional analysis of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years or older from 1999 to 2014 using the Medicare Inpatient and Denominator files. Spatial mixed models adjusted for age, sex, and race were fit to calculate county-specific risk-standardized revascularization rates. Mixed models were fit to assess trends in outcomes after adjustment for demographics, comorbidities, and symptomatic status. Exposures: Carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting. Main Outcomes and Measures: Revascularization rates per 100 000 beneficiary-years of fee-for-service enrollment, in-hospital mortality, 30-day stroke or death, 30-day stroke, myocardial infarction, or death, 30-day all-cause mortality, and 1-year stroke. Results: During the study, 937 111 unique patients underwent carotid endarterectomy (mean age, 75.8 years; 43% women) and 231 077 underwent carotid artery stenting (mean age, 75.4 years; 49% women). There were 81 306 patients who underwent endarterectomy in 1999 and 36 325 in 2014; national rates per 100 000 beneficiary-years decreased from 298 in 1999-2000 to 128 in 2013-2014 (P < .001). The number of patients who underwent stenting ranged from 10 416 in 1999 to 22 865 in 2006 (an increase per 100 000 beneficiary-years from 40 in 1999-2000 to 75 in 2005-2006; P < .001); by 2014, there were 10 208 patients who underwent stenting and the rate decreased to 38 per 100 000 beneficiary-years (P < .001). Outcomes improved over time despite increases in vascular risk factors (eg, hypertension prevalence increased from 67% to 81% among patients who underwent endarterectomy and from 61% to 70% among patients who underwent stenting) and the proportion of symptomatic patients (all P < .001). There were adjusted annual decreases in 30-day ischemic stroke or death of 2.90% (95% CI, 2.63% to 3.18%) among patients who underwent endarterectomy and 1.13% (95% CI, 0.71% to 1.54%) among patients who underwent stenting; an absolute decrease from 1999 to 2014 was observed for endarterectomy (1.4%; 95% CI, 1.2% to 1.5%) but not stenting (-0.1%; 95% CI, -0.5% to 0.4%). Rates for 1-year ischemic stroke decreased after endarterectomy (absolute decrease, 3.5% [95% CI, 3.2% to 3.7%]; adjusted annual decrease, 2.17% [95% CI, 2.00% to 2.34%]) and stenting (absolute decrease, 1.6% [95% CI, 1.2% to 2.1%]; adjusted annual decrease, 1.86% [95% CI, 1.45%-2.26%]). Additional improvements were noted for in-hospital mortality, 30-day stroke, myocardial infarction, or death, and 30-day all-cause mortality as well as within demographic subgroups. Conclusions and Relevance: Among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries, the performance of carotid endarterectomy declined from 1999 to 2014, whereas the performance of carotid artery stenting increased until 2006 and then declined from 2007 to 2014. Outcomes improved despite increases in vascular risk factors.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCarotid StenosisCross-Sectional StudiesEndarterectomy, CarotidFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMedicareMyocardial InfarctionPoisson DistributionRisk FactorsStentsStroke

Identifiers

PMID28975306
PMCPMC5818799
OpenAlexW2754886146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.