ArticleGlobal qualitative nursing research
Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Global qualitative nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Motivations and Decision Making Processes of Men With X-linked Retinoschisis Considering Participation in an Ocular Gene Therapy Trial.American journal of ophthalmology · 2019Trial
- Transforming patient recruitment in clinical trials: Communication training to manage uncertainties about risks and benefits.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Article
- Ten simple rules for research with humans.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Prospective Preference Assessment of a Pharmacological Clinical Trial to Alter the Progression of Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis After ACL Reconstruction.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Compliance to food safety standards: Determining the barriers within the hotel industry.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Strategies to build trust in the conduct of clinical trials: Stakeholders' views in a qualitative study in Ghana.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Verbal consent in biomedical research: moving toward a future standard practice?Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Comprehension of informed consent and voluntary participation in registration cohorts for phase IIb HIV vaccine trial in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania: a qualitative descriptive study.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- Investigating the socioeconomic impacts of sewage spillages on businesses in the Umhlanga Rocks coastline area.Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa) · 2024Article
- Article
- Contributing to Accessibility Datasets: Reflections on Sharing Study Data by Blind People.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2023Article
- Digital Informed Consent for Older Adults in Emergency Department Research.Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics Conference · 2023Article
- Community-engaged training in informed consent.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Challenges and Possible Solutions to Adapting to Virtual Recruitment: Lessons Learned from a Survey Study during the Covid-19 Pandemic.Ethics & human research · 2022Article
- Article
- Understanding of Critical Elements of Informed Consent in Genomic Research: A Case of a Paediatric HIV-TB Research Project in Uganda.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2022Article
- Navigating ethical challenges of conducting randomized clinical trials on COVID-19.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2022Article
- Development of Written Materials for Participants in an Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias Screening Trial.Journal of patient experience · 2022Article
- Biobanking and risk assessment: a comprehensive typology of risks for an adaptive risk governance.Life sciences, society and policy · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple studies have documented major limitations in the informed consent process for the recruitment of clinical research participants. One challenging aspect of this process is successful communication of risks and benefits to potential research participants. This study explored the opinions and attitudes of informed consent experts about conveying risks and benefits to inform the development of a survey about the perspectives of research nurses who are responsible for obtaining informed consent for clinical trials. The major themes identified were strategies for risks and benefits communication, ensuring comprehension, and preparation for the role of the consent administrator. From the experts' perspective, inadequate education and training of the research staff responsible for informed consent process contribute to deficiencies in the informed consent process and risks and benefits communication. Inconsistencies in experts' opinions and critique of certain widely used communication practices require further consideration and additional research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.