ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2016
Unexpected Collection of Pulmonary Venous Blood from a Pulmonary Artery Catheter: A Case Report.
Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPressure and waveform at the catheter tip are continuously monitored during catheterization of pulmonary artery to ensure accurate catheter placement. We present a case in which pulmonary venous blood was unexpectedly collected from the pulmonary artery catheter despite pulmonary artery pressure and waveform detection at the catheter tip, and describe the measures taken to correct the catheter placement. CASE PRESENTATION: A 74-year-old male underwent mitral valve plasty for cardiac failure caused by mitral valve regurgitation. Preoperative transthoracic echocardiography showed no septal shunt. The pulmonary artery was catheterized through a sheath introducer in the right jugular vein, and the balloon was inflated after insertion of a 15-cm catheter. The catheter was advanced until a pulmonary artery waveform was detected and the pulmonary artery wedge pressure was 21 mmHg at end-expiration. The balloon was deflated and the catheter tip was pulled back 3 cm. Pulmonary artery waveforms and appropriate a and v waves were detected, and transesophageal echocardiography confirmed the location of the catheter tip in the right pulmonary artery. The first collected blood sample had an oxygen partial pressure of 358.8 mmHg, carbon dioxide partial pressure of 20.1 mmHg, and oxygen saturation of 99%, indicating pulmonary venous blood. The pulmonary artery catheter was pulled back 5 cm, but a second blood sample showed the same results. The catheter was pulled back a further 6 cm while the location of the catheter tip was monitored on X-ray fluoroscopy. Blood gas testing through the catheter tip showed oxygen saturation of 84.4 % and oxygen partial pressure of 41.6 mmHg. Surgery was performed uneventfully. Postoperative chest radiographs showed proper placement of the pulmonary artery catheter, but radiographs on postoperative day 1 showed over-insertion, although the insertion length was unchanged. The catheter was removed. The patient was discharged 2 months postoperatively.
conclusionsOur case highlights the fact that the tip of the pulmonary artery catheter can easily advance into a peripheral branch of the pulmonary artery and cause pulmonary venous blood to be sampled instead of pulmonary arterial blood. A variety of monitoring techniques are needed to confirm accurate catheter placement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.