Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28974956›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2017

The Role of Soil Microorganisms in Plant Mineral Nutrition-Current Knowledge and Future Directions.

Richard Jacoby, Manuela Peukert, Antonella Succurro, Anna Koprivova, Stanislav Kopriva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 307 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
307citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

307 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

247 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Richard JacobyBotanical Institute, Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS), University of CologneCologne, Germany.
Manuela PeukertBotanical Institute, Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS), University of CologneCologne, Germany.
Antonella SuccurroBotanical Institute, Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS), University of CologneCologne, Germany.
Anna KoprivovaBotanical Institute, Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS), University of CologneCologne, Germany.
Stanislav KoprivaBotanical Institute, Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS), University of CologneCologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In their natural environment, plants are part of a rich ecosystem including numerous and diverse microorganisms in the soil. It has been long recognized that some of these microbes, such as mycorrhizal fungi or nitrogen fixing symbiotic bacteria, play important roles in plant performance by improving mineral nutrition. However, the full range of microbes associated with plants and their potential to replace synthetic agricultural inputs has only recently started to be uncovered. In the last few years, a great progress has been made in the knowledge on composition of rhizospheric microbiomes and their dynamics. There is clear evidence that plants shape microbiome structures, most probably by root exudates, and also that bacteria have developed various adaptations to thrive in the rhizospheric niche. The mechanisms of these interactions and the processes driving the alterations in microbiomes are, however, largely unknown. In this review, we focus on the interaction of plants and root associated bacteria enhancing plant mineral nutrition, summarizing the current knowledge in several research fields that can converge to improve our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underpinning this phenomenon.

Indexed as

mathematical modelingmicrobiomenatural variationplant–microbe interactionsplant nutritionroot exudates

Identifiers

PMID28974956
PMCPMC5610682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.