ReviewFrontiers in psychology2017
The Influence of Emotion on Fairness-Related Decision Making: A Critical Review of Theories and Evidence.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Spicy Food on Sense of Fairness: Mediating Effects of Aggression and Pathogen Avoidance.PsyCh journal · 2025Article
- Common and distinct equity preferences in children and adults.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Intention affects fairness processing: Evidence from behavior and representational similarity analysis of event-related potential signals.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Mood and judgment in a dyadic stress context.Emotion (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Article
- Observing others give & take: A computational account of bystanders' feelings and actions.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Ingroup favoritism overrides fairness when resources are limited.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The rewarding compensatory mechanism of music enhances the sense of fairness.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
- Morality is Supreme: The Roles of Morality, Fairness and Group Identity in the Ultimatum Paradigm.Psychology research and behavior management · 2022Article
- Social emotional ability development (SEAD): An integrated model of practical emotion-based competencies.Motivation and emotion · 2022Article
- Shall I Show My Emotions? The Effects of Facial Expressions in the Ultimatum Game.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Data-Driven Discrimination, Perceived Fairness, and Consumer Trust-The Perspective of Consumer Attribution.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- The fair decision-making of children and adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder from the perspective of dual-process theories.BMC psychiatry · 2020Article
- Fourth-Party Evaluation of Third-Party Pro-social Help and Punishment: An ERP Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fairness-related decision making is an important issue in the field of decision making. Traditional theories emphasize the roles of inequity aversion and reciprocity, whereas recent research increasingly shows that emotion plays a critical role in this type of decision making. In this review, we summarize the influences of three types of emotions (i.e., the integral emotion experienced at the time of decision making, the incidental emotion aroused by a task-unrelated dispositional or situational source, and the interaction of emotion and cognition) on fairness-related decision making. Specifically, we first introduce three dominant theories that describe how emotion may influence fairness-related decision making (i.e., the wounded pride/spite model, affect infusion model, and dual-process model). Next, we collect behavioral and neural evidence for and against these theories. Finally, we propose that future research on fairness-related decision making should focus on inducing incidental social emotion, avoiding irrelevant emotion when regulating, exploring the individual differences in emotional dispositions, and strengthening the ecological validity of the paradigm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.