ArticleTzu chi medical journal
Two-phase laparoendoscopic single-site cervical ligament-sparing hysterectomy: An initial experience.
Article in Tzu chi medical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo report our initial experience with and the short-term outcomes of two-phase laparoendoscopic single-site cervical ligament-sparing hysterectomy (LESS-CLSH). MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective case study included 40 women who underwent LESS-CLSH from January 2014 to December 2016 at Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital. Uterine specimens were extracted through contained manual morcellation with a tissue pouch. The first phase was LESS supracervical hysterectomy and conization of the internal orifice of the cervix. The second phase was transvaginal cervical conization and cylinderization. Women with a uterus diameter of >12 cm, a broad ligament myoma, or severe pelvic adhesion were categorized into a difficult group, and others were categorized into a nondifficult group.
resultsThe difficult group required more time and had more blood loss than the nondifficult group. The mean surgical time was 187.2 ± 33.9 and 139.1 ± 20.7 min, and the mean blood loss was 533.3 ± 333.3 and 225.3 ± 168.2 mL in the difficult and nondifficult groups, respectively. The overall visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at 0-4, 24, and 48 h after surgery were 7.1 ± 1.9, 4.2 ± 1.6, and 2.3 ± 1.5, respectively; no difference in the VAS pain scores, pain relief score, and hospitalization duration was observed between the two groups. Minor surgical complications or adverse events on follow-up were noted. Three months after surgery, the diameter and thickness of the cervix were decreased by approximately 0.5 and 1.0 cm, respectively.
conclusionLESS-CLSH is a minimally invasive, safe, and feasible approach, even for difficult laparoscopic hysterectomy. Contained manual morcellation enables more controlled specimen removal than morcellation only.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.