Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28974596›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2017

New horizons in multimodality molecular imaging and novel radiotracers.

Sally Barrington, Philip Blower, Gary Cook

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. [Theranostics · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sally BarringtonKing's College London and Guy's & St Thomas' PET Centre, London, UK.
Philip BlowerKing's College London, London, UK.
Gary CookDepartment of Cancer Imaging and Guy's & St Thomas' PET Centre, King's College London, London, UK gary.cook@kcl.ac.uk.
King's College London · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16463Department of Health RP-2016-07-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET)/computerised tomography is now established in clinical practice for oncologic and non-oncological applications. Improvement and development of scanner hardware has allowed faster acquisitions and wider application. PET/magnetic resonance imaging offers potential improvements in diagnostic accuracy and patient acceptability but clinical applications are still being developed. A range of new radiotracers and non-radioactive contrast agents is likely to lead to a growth in hybrid molecular imaging applications that will allow better characterisation of disease processes.

Indexed as

Molecular ImagingMultimodal ImagingContrast MediaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadioisotopesTorsoContrast MediaRadioisotopesComputerised tomographycontrast agentsmagnetic resonance imagingoptical imagingpositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID28974596
PMCPMC6301925
OpenAlexW2762142844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.