ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2017
Thoracic ultrasound experiences among respiratory specialty trainees in the UK.
Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pulmonary passport: a service evaluation study of a standardised web-based procedure logbook to aid specialist respiratory training and appraisal.BMJ open respiratory research · 2020Article
- Thoracic ultrasound competence for ultrasound-guided pleural procedures.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2019Review
- Training opportunities in thoracic ultrasound for respiratory trainees: are current guidelines practical?BMJ open respiratory research · 2019Article
- Thoracic ultrasound experiences among respiratory specialty trainees in the UK.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2018Article
- Providing safe and effective pleural medicine services in the UK: an aspirational statement from UK pleural physicians.BMJ open respiratory research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achieving competence in thoracic ultrasound is a mandatory requirement for the successful completion of respiratory specialty training in the UK. We evaluated trainee competencies, access to training and confidence in thoracic ultrasound by means of a nationally distributed survey with the participation of 202 (of approximately 600) respiratory trainees. 65.8% (131/199) of responders are RCR Level 1 accredited and 20.6% (22/107) of these trainees had performed fewer than 20 ultrasounds in the past year. 29.2% (50/171) of trainees reported that access to an ultrasonographer for advice was either 'not easy' or 'impossible'. 59% (107/171) of all respondents are 'never' or 'rarely' supervised, with 60% (102/169) of queries answered by real-time evaluation or review of stored media. Encouragingly ultrasound training has evolved considerably in recent years, but ongoing work needs to focus on improving supervision and training. There is a case for reviewing current guidance and to consider tailoring training and expectations to align with the specific needs of respiratory registrars. We propose a revision of the current Royal College of Radiologists framework towards a respiratory specialist led accreditation in thoracic ultrasound.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.