Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28974500›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2017

Sex Differences in Circulating Progenitor Cells.

Matthew L Topel, Salim S Hayek, Yi-An Ko, Pratik B Sandesara, Ayman Samman Tahhan, Iraj Hesaroieh, Ernestine Mahar, Greg S Martin, Edmund K Waller, Arshed A Quyyumi

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Mechanism of heart failure after myocardial infarction.The Journal of international medical research · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Final five-year results of the REMEDEE Registry: Real-world experience with the dual-therapy COMBO stent.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Sex differences in cancer mechanisms.Biology of sex differences · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew L TopelDivision of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Salim S HayekDivision of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Yi-An KoDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Pratik B SandesaraDivision of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Ayman Samman TahhanDivision of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Iraj HesaroiehDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Ernestine MaharDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Greg S MartinDepartment of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Edmund K WallerDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Arshed A QuyyumiDivision of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA aquyyum@emory.edu.
Emory University · US

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
Metabolomics of subclinical and clinical cardiovascular diseaseP20HL113451 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JONES, DEAN PAUL · 2012 to 2016
$4.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NHLBI NIH HHS P20 HL113451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLower levels of circulating progenitor cells (PCs) reflect impaired endogenous regenerative capacity and are associated with aging, vascular disease, and poor outcomes. Whether biologic sex and sex hormones influence PC numbers remains a subject of controversy. We sought to determine sex differences in circulating PCs in both healthy persons and patients with coronary artery disease, and to determine their association with sex hormone levels. METHODS AND

resultsIn 642 participants (mean age 48 years, 69% women, 23% black) free from cardiovascular disease, we measured circulating PC counts as CD45

conclusionsWomen have lower circulating hematopoietic PC levels compared with men. Estrogen levels are modestly associated with PC levels in women. Since PCs are reflective of endogenous regenerative capacity, these findings may at least partly explain the rise in adverse cardiovascular events in women with aging and menopause.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesCell CountCoronary Artery DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesEndothelial Progenitor CellsEstradiolFemaleHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansMaleMenopauseMiddle AgedPhenotypeBiomarkersEstradiolTestosteroneCD133CD34CXCR4estrogenprogenitor cellvascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2

Identifiers

PMID28974500
PMCPMC5721840
OpenAlexW2761947966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.