Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28974497›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2017

Outcomes of Reoperation After Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Implications for Index Repair Strategy.

Hanghang Wang, Matthew Wagner, Ehsan Benrashid, Jeffrey Keenan, Alice Wang, David Ranney, Babatunde Yerokun, Jeffrey G Gaca, Richard L McCann, G Chad Hughes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Current review of acute type A aortic dissection in Malaysia.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hanghang WangDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Matthew WagnerDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Ehsan BenrashidDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Jeffrey KeenanDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Alice WangDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
David RanneyDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Babatunde YerokunDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Jeffrey G GacaDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Richard L McCannDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
G Chad HughesDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC gchad.hughes@duke.edu.
Duke Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal surgical approach for management of acute type A aortic dissection remains controversial. This study aimed to assess outcomes of reoperation after acute type A dissection repair to help guide decision making around index operative strategy. METHODS AND

resultsAll aortic reoperations (n=129) at a single referral institution from August 2005 to April 2016 after prior acute type A dissection repair were reviewed. The primary outcome was 30-day or in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included organ-specific morbidity and 1- and 5-year outcomes as estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The majority of initial reoperations were proximal aortic (aortic valve, aortic root, or ascending) or aortic arch procedures (62.5%, n=55); most initial reoperations were performed in the elective setting (83.1%, n=74). Additional nonstaged second or more reoperations were required in 21 patients (23.6%) after the initial reoperation, during a median follow-up of 2.5 years after the initial reoperation. Thirty-day or in-hospital mortality for all reoperations was 7.0% (elective: 6.3%; nonelective: 11.1%) with acceptable rates of organ-specific morbidity, given the procedural complexity. One- and 5-year overall survival after initial reoperation was 85.9% and 64.9%, respectively, with aorta-specific survival of 88% at 5 years.

conclusionsReoperation after acute type A aortic dissection repair is associated with low rates of mortality and morbidity. These data support more limited index repair for acute type A dissection, especially for patients undergoing index repair in lower volume centers without expertise in extensive repair, because reoperations, if needed, can be performed safely in referral aortic centers.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationEndovascular ProceduresAcute DiseaseAgedAortic AneurysmAortic DissectionClinical Decision-MakingFemaleHospital MortalityHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationaortic dissectionaortic surgery

Identifiers

PMID28974497
PMCPMC5721847
OpenAlexW2763852549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.