Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28974255›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2017

Comparison of patient perceived primary care quality in public clinics, public hospitals and private clinics in rural China.

Wenhua Wang, Elizabeth Maitland, Stephen Nicholas, Ekaterina Loban, Jeannie Haggerty

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The effect of health facility ownership on perceived healthcare quality: evidence from Ghana.International journal of health economics and management · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Wenhua WangSchool of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, 115 Donghu Road, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, People's Republic of China. wenhua.wang@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-5429-728X
Elizabeth MaitlandSchool of Management, Australian School of Business, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Stephen NicholasSchool of Management and Commerce, Tianjin Normal University, West Bin Shui Avenue, Tianjin, 300074, People's Republic of China.
Ekaterina LobanDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Hayes Pavilion, Suite 4759, 3830 Avenue Lacombe, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1M5, Canada.
Jeannie HaggertyDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Hayes Pavilion, Suite 4767, 3830 Avenue Lacombe, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1M5, Canada.
McGill University · CABeijing Foreign Studies University · CNUNSW Sydney · AUWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn rural China, patients have free choice of health facilities for outpatient services. Comparison studies exploring the attributes of different health facilities can help identify optimal primary care service models. Using a representative sample of Chinese provinces, this study aimed to compare patients' rating of three primary care service models used by rural residents (public clinics, public hospitals and private clinics) on a range of health care attributes related to responsiveness.

methodsThis was a secondary analysis using the household survey data from World Health Organization (WHO) Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). Using a multistage cluster sampling strategy, eight provinces were selected and finally 3435 overall respondents reporting they had visited public clinics, public hospitals or private clinics during the last year, were included in our analysis. Five items were used to measure patient perceived quality in five domains including prompt attention, communication and autonomy, dignity and confidentiality. ANOVA and Turkey's post hoc tests were used to conduct comparative analysis of five domains. Separate multivariate linear regression models were estimated to examine the association of primary care service models with each domain after controlling for patient characteristics.

resultsThe distribution of last health facilities visited was: 29.5% public clinics; 31.2% public hospitals and; 39.3% private clinics. Public clinics perform best in all five domains: prompt attention (4.15), dignity (4.17), communication (4.07), autonomy (4.05) and confidentiality (4.02). Public hospitals perform better than private clinics in dignity (4.03 vs 3.94), communication (3.97 vs 3.82), autonomy (3.92 vs 3.74) and confidentiality (3.94 vs 3.73), but equivalently in prompt attention (3.92 vs 3.93). Rural residents who are older, wealthier, and with higher self-rated health status have significantly higher patient perceived quality of care in all domains.

conclusionsRural public clinics, which share many characteristics with the optimal primary care delivery model, should be strongly strengthened to respond to patients' needs. Better doctor-patient interaction training would improve respect, confidentiality, autonomy and, most importantly, health care quality for rural patients.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthQuality of Health CareAdolescentAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesChinaFemaleHealth Care SurveysHospitals, PublicHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CarePrivate SectorPublic SectorRural Health ServicesAccessibilityInterpersonal communicationPatient experiencePatient responsivenessPrimary care qualityRespectfulness

Identifiers

PMID28974255
PMCPMC5627445
OpenAlexW2762112063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.