Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28974230›Full record

ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2017

Effect of day 3 embryo morphometrics and morphokinetics on survival and implantation after slow freezing-thawing and after vitrification-warming: a retrospective cohort study.

Elia Fernandez Gallardo, Carl Spiessens, Thomas D'Hooghe, Sophie Debrock

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02639715 (Morphometrics and Morphokinetics of Thawed Oocytes and Embryos), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02639715 completednot on this map

Morphometrics and Morphokinetics of Thawed Oocytes and Embryos

TypeobservationalSponsorSophie DebrockRan2014 to 2015Enrolled1,272ConditionsInfertility
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical outcomes of fresh and frozen embryos transfer afterZhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elia Fernandez GallardoKU Leuven - University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium. elia.fernandezgallardo@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7791-2644
Carl SpiessensKU Leuven - University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Thomas D'HoogheKU Leuven - University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Sophie DebrockKU Leuven - University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMorphometric and morphokinetic evaluation of in vitro cultured human embryos allows evaluation without time restriction and reduces intra- and inter-observer variability. Even though these technologies have been reported to improve the quality of cleavage stage embryo evaluation during fresh culture, possible advantages in the evaluation of cryopreserved embryos have been scarcely explored. This study aims to compare morphometric and morphokinetic parameters between slow frozen and vitrified embryos and to determine their relationship to embryo survival and implantation rate (IR) after thawing/warming.

methodsDuring fresh culture, morphometric characteristics (Total Cell Volume (TCV), symmetry, fragmentation and number of blastomeres) were measured in 286 thawed/warmed embryos. Likewise, after thawing/warming, similar morphometric characteristics were measured in 135 survived embryos. Moreover, morphokinetic parameters (time to mitosis resumption and time to compaction) were measured in 90 embryos after thawing/warming. Then, using linear regression, we investigated the differences between vitrified and slow frozen embryos and the relation of the measured characteristics to embryo survival and IR. Statistical corrections were applied to account for data clustering and for multiple testing.

resultsVitrified embryos resume mitosis and start compaction significantly earlier than slow frozen embryos. Mitosis resumption rate was 82% for vitrified and 63% for slow frozen embryos and median time to mitosis resumption was 7.6 h and 13.1 h (p = 0.02), respectively. Compaction rate was 62% in vitrified and only 23% in slow frozen embryos. Median time to compaction was 18.1 h for vitrified embryos but, for slow frozen could not be computed since less than half of the slow frozen embryos reached compaction (p = 0.0001). Moreover, intact embryos resume mitosis significantly earlier than not intact ones regardless of the freezing method (rate: 79% vs. 66%, median time: 7.6 h vs 14.6 h, respectively, p = 0.03). Regarding morphometrics, slow frozen embryos showed lower TCV and higher blastomere symmetry after thawing than vitrified embryos despite having similar blastomere number. IR was related to blastomere number at cryopreservation in slow frozen embryos, but not in vitrified ones.

conclusionsInterestingly, vitrified/warmed embryos undergo mitosis resumption and compaction significantly earlier than slow frozen/thawed embryos. However, the clinical use of this morphokinetic parameters still remains to be investigated in larger studies.

trial registrationRetrospectively registered on December 15, 2015 NCT02639715 .

Indexed as

Cell ShapeCell SizeEmbryo ImplantationEmbryo LossAdultBlastomeresCells, CulturedCleavage Stage, OvumCohort StudiesCryopreservationEmbryo, MammalianEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy RateHuman embryoMorphokineticsMorphometricsSlow freezingVitrification

Identifiers

PMID28974230
PMCPMC5627418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.