Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28974208›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

Using contraceptives to delay first birth: a qualitative study of individual, community and health provider perceptions in southern Tanzania.

Yovitha Sedekia, Caroline Jones, Rose Nathan, Joanna Schellenberg, Tanya Marchant

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03995043 (Project for Reproductive Equity Through Volunteers and Entrepreneurship, Networks and Technology), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03995043 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2027, after this paper: background citation

Project for Reproductive Equity Through Volunteers and Entrepreneurship, Networks and Technology: The PREVENT Project Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorDr. Karen YeatesRan2027 to 2029Enrolled198ConditionsContraception, Pregnancy Related, Reproductive BehaviorArmsEducation, Personal Support, Access to contraception
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Experiences of women, men and healthcare workers accessing family planning services in Malawi: A grounded theory.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Yovitha SedekiaIfakara Health Institute, P.O BOX 78373, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania. Yovitha.sedekia@lshtm.ac.uk.
Caroline JonesKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Rose NathanIfakara Health Institute, P.O BOX 78373, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.
Joanna SchellenbergDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Tanya MarchantDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Ifakara Health Institute · TZKenya Medical Research Institute · KELondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung adolescents and unmarried women in low and middle income countries face challenges in accessing family planning services. One factor likely to limit contraceptive use is the attitude and opinion of local stakeholders such as community leaders and health workers. Much of the existing evidence on this topic focuses on women who have already started childbearing. Using primary qualitative data, we explored individual, community and health provider's perceptions about using modern contraceptives to delay the first birth in a high fertility setting.

methodsA descriptive qualitative study was conducted in Tandahimba district in southern Tanzania between December 2014 and March 2015. We conducted 8 focus group discussions with men and women and 25 in-depth interviews (18 with women, 4 with family planning service providers and 3 with district-level staff). Participants were purposively sampled. Data transcripts were managed and coded using Nvivo 11 software and we employed a thematic framework analysis.

resultsThree main themes emerged about using modern contraceptives to delay first birth: (1) the social and biological status of the woman (2) the type of contraceptive and (3) non-alignment among national policies for adolescents. Use of modern contraceptives to delay first birth was widely acceptable for women who were students, young, unmarried and women in unstable marriage. But long-acting reversible methods such as implants and intrauterine devices were perceived as inappropriate methods for delaying first birth, partly because of fears around delayed return to fecundity, discontinuation once woman's marital status changes and permanently limiting future fertility. The support for use of modern contraceptives to delay a first pregnancy was not unanimous. A small number of participants from both rural and urban areas did not approve the use of contraceptive methods before the birth of a first baby at all, not even for students. There was lack of clarity and consistency on the definition of 'young' and that had direct implications for access, autonomy in decision-making, confidentiality and consent for young people.

conclusionsWomen who wish to delay their first birth face challenges related to restrictions by age and method imposed by stakeholders in accessing and provision of modern contraceptives. There is a need for a clearly communicated policy on minimum age and appropriate method choice for delayers of first birth.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthContraception BehaviorAdolescentBirth OrderChildContraceptionFamily Planning ServicesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePregnancyQualitative ResearchTanzaniaYoung AdultAcceptabilityDelayers of first birthFamily planning useMaternal and child healthModern contraceptivesTanzania

Identifiers

PMID28974208
PMCPMC5627429
OpenAlexW2762315723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.