Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28974195›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2017

A qualitative inquiry on pregnant women's preferences for mental health screening.

Hamideh Bayrampour, Deborah A McNeil, Karen Benzies, Charleen Salmon, Karen Gelb, Suzanne Tough

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Contemplating Help-Seeking in Perinatal Psychological Distress-A Meta-Ethnography.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hamideh BayrampourDepartment of Family Practice, Midwifery Program, University of British Columbia, 3rd Floor David Strangway Building, 320-5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada. hamideh.bayrampour@ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3008-712X
Deborah A McNeilAlberta Health Services and Associate Professor in Faculty of Nursing and Department of Community Health Sciences Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, T2W 3N2, Canada.
Karen BenziesProfessor in Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Charleen SalmonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Karen GelbMidwifery Program, Department of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Suzanne ToughAlberta Innovates Health Solutions Health Scholar and Professor in Department of Pediatrics and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, T3B 6A8, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAAlberta Health Services · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproaches to screening can influence the acceptance of and comfort with mental health screening. Qualitative evidence on pregnant women's comfort with different screening approaches and disclosure of mental health concerns is scant. The purpose of this study was to understand women's perspectives of different mental health screening approaches and the perceived barriers to the communication and disclosure of their mental health concerns during pregnancy.

methodsA qualitative descriptive study was undertaken. Fifteen women, with a singleton pregnancy, were recruited from a community maternity clinic and a mental health clinic in Calgary, Canada. Semi-structured interviews were conducted during both the 2nd and 3rd trimesters. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsPreferences for mental health screening approaches varied. Most women with a known mental health issue preferred a communicative approach, while women without a known mental health history who struggled with emotional problems were inclined towards less interactive approaches and reported a reluctance to share their concerns. Barriers to communicating mental health concerns included a lack of emotional literacy (i.e., not recognizing the symptoms, not understanding the emotions), fear of disclosure outcomes (i.e., fear of being judged, fear of the consequences), feeling uncomfortable to be seen vulnerable, perception about the role of prenatal care provider (internal barriers); the lack of continuity of care, depersonalized care, lack of feedback, and unfamiliarity with/uncertainty about the availability of support (structural barriers).

conclusionsThe overlaps between some themes identified for the reasons behind a preferred screening approach and barriers reported by women to communicate mental health concerns suggest that having options may help women overcome some of the current disclosure barriers and enable them to engage in the process. Furthermore, the continuity of care, clarity around the outcomes of disclosing mental health concerns, and availability of immediate support can help women move from providing "the best answer" to providing an authentic answer.

Indexed as

AdultCanadaDisclosureEmotionsFearFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMental DisordersPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnant PeoplePrenatal DiagnosisQualitative ResearchAnxietyDepressionMental health screeningPregnancyPrenatal care

Identifiers

PMID28974195
PMCPMC5627476
OpenAlexW2762974975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.