Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28973942›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

High-intensity urban light installation dramatically alters nocturnal bird migration.

Benjamin M Van Doren, Kyle G Horton, Adriaan M Dokter, Holger Klinck, Susan B Elbin, Andrew Farnsworth

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Light pollution and its possible influence on the wild fauna in parks in Oslo, Norway.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Endocrine-circadian interactions in birds: implications when nights are no longer dark.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Olfaction in the Anthropocene: NOScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Light pollution in complex ecological systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benjamin M Van DorenInformation Science Program, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY 14850.ORCID 0000-0002-7355-6005
Kyle G HortonInformation Science Program, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY 14850.
Adriaan M DokterInformation Science Program, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY 14850.
Holger KlinckBioacoustics Research Program, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY 14850.
Susan B ElbinNew York City Audubon, New York, NY 10010.
Andrew FarnsworthInformation Science Program, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY 14850; af27@cornell.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9854-4449

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Billions of nocturnally migrating birds move through increasingly photopolluted skies, relying on cues for navigation and orientation that artificial light at night (ALAN) can impair. However, no studies have quantified avian responses to powerful ground-based light sources in urban areas. We studied effects of ALAN on migrating birds by monitoring the beams of the National September 11 Memorial & Museum's "Tribute in Light" in New York, quantifying behavioral responses with radar and acoustic sensors and modeling disorientation and attraction with simulations. This single light source induced significant behavioral alterations in birds, even in good visibility conditions, in this heavily photopolluted environment, and to altitudes up to 4 km. We estimate that the installation influenced ≈1.1 million birds during our study period of 7 d over 7 y. When the installation was illuminated, birds aggregated in high densities, decreased flight speeds, followed circular flight paths, and vocalized frequently. Simulations revealed a high probability of disorientation and subsequent attraction for nearby birds, and bird densities near the installation exceeded magnitudes 20 times greater than surrounding baseline densities during each year's observations. However, behavioral disruptions disappeared when lights were extinguished, suggesting that selective removal of light during nights with substantial bird migration is a viable strategy for minimizing potentially fatal interactions among ALAN, structures, and birds. Our results also highlight the value of additional studies describing behavioral patterns of nocturnally migrating birds in powerful lights in urban areas as well as conservation implications for such lighting installations.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationBirdsAnimalsLightNew York Cityartificial lightflight callsnocturnal migrationradar ornithologyremote sensing

Identifiers

PMID28973942
PMCPMC5651764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.