Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28973917›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Root-associated fungal microbiota of nonmycorrhizal

Juliana Almario, Ganga Jeena, Jörg Wunder, Gregor Langen, Alga Zuccaro, George Coupland, Marcel Bucher

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed
56.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 289 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Plant direct · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Microbial drivers of root plasticity.The New phytologist · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juliana AlmarioBotanical Institute, Cologne Biocenter, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany.
Ganga JeenaBotanical Institute, Cologne Biocenter, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany.
Jörg WunderDepartment of Plant Developmental Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Cologne, Germany.
Gregor LangenBotanical Institute, Cologne Biocenter, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany.
Alga ZuccaroBotanical Institute, Cologne Biocenter, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany.
George CouplandCluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany.
Marcel BucherBotanical Institute, Cologne Biocenter, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany; m.bucher@uni-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1680-9413
University of Cologne · DEMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most land plants live in association with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and rely on this symbiosis to scavenge phosphorus (P) from soil. The ability to establish this partnership has been lost in some plant lineages like the Brassicaceae, which raises the question of what alternative nutrition strategies such plants have to grow in P-impoverished soils. To understand the contribution of plant-microbiota interactions, we studied the root-associated fungal microbiome of

Indexed as

ArabisMicrobiotaMycorrhizaePhosphorusPlant RootsRhizosphereSoilSymbiosisPhosphorusSoilBrassicaceaefungal endophyteHelotialesmicrobiomenutrient transfer

Identifiers

PMID28973917
PMCPMC5676915
OpenAlexW2763097839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.