Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28973784›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2018

Peanuts that keep aflatoxin at bay: a threshold that matters.

Kiran K Sharma, Arunima Pothana, Kalyani Prasad, Dilip Shah, Jagdeep Kaur, Deepak Bhatnagar, Zhi-Yuan Chen, Yenjit Raruang, Jeffrey W Cary, Kanniah Rajasekaran and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ectopic Expression ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The coupling effect ofSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Progress in genetic engineering and genome editing of peanuts: revealing the future of crop improvement.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kiran K SharmaInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Arunima PothanaInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Kalyani PrasadInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Dilip ShahDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jagdeep KaurDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Deepak BhatnagarSouthern Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA/ARS), New Orleans, LA, USA.
Zhi-Yuan ChenDepartment of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, Agricultural center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Yenjit RaruangDepartment of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, Agricultural center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Jeffrey W CarySouthern Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA/ARS), New Orleans, LA, USA.
Kanniah RajasekaranSouthern Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA/ARS), New Orleans, LA, USA.
Hari Kishan SudiniInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Pooja Bhatnagar-MathurInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aflatoxin contamination in peanuts poses major challenges for vulnerable populations of sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Developing peanut varieties to combat preharvest Aspergillus flavus infection and resulting aflatoxin contamination has thus far remained a major challenge, confounded by highly complex peanut-Aspergilli pathosystem. Our study reports achieving a high level of resistance in peanut by overexpressing (OE) antifungal plant defensins MsDef1 and MtDef4.2, and through host-induced gene silencing (HIGS) of aflM and aflP genes from the aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway. While the former improves genetic resistance to A. flavus infection, the latter inhibits aflatoxin production in the event of infection providing durable resistance against different Aspergillus flavus morphotypes and negligible aflatoxin content in several peanut events/lines well. A strong positive correlation was observed between aflatoxin accumulation and decline in transcription of the aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway genes in both OE-Def and HIGS lines. Transcriptomic signatures in the resistant lines revealed key mechanisms such as regulation of aflatoxin synthesis, its packaging and export control, besides the role of reactive oxygen species-scavenging enzymes that render enhanced protection in the OE and HIGS lines. This is the first study to demonstrate highly effective biotechnological strategies for successfully generating peanuts that are near-immune to aflatoxin contamination, offering a panacea for serious food safety, health and trade issues in the semi-arid regions.

Indexed as

AflatoxinsArachisAspergillusAspergillus flavusBiotechnologyDefensinsFood ContaminationFood SafetyGene SilencingPlant ProteinsTranscriptomeAflatoxinsDefensinsPlant ProteinsaflatoxinAspergillus flavusdefensinsfood safetyhost-induced gene silencingmycotoxinspeanut

Identifiers

PMID28973784
PMCPMC5902767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.